See AI Disclaimer at Bottom
Click Below for Additional Meeting Resources:
Meeting Opening and Public Comment (Link: 00:01:00 – 00:03:00)
Amy O’Connor called the Swampscott School Committee meeting to order on Thursday, November 20, 2025. The meeting began with the Pledge of Allegiance, which was recited by the committee members.
O’Connor acknowledged a different setup for the meeting and thanked the crew and Miguel for making the new arrangement happen, explaining that the change was intended to make it easier for committee members to communicate with each other during the meeting.
The meeting proceeded to public comment. O’Connor asked if anyone was online, and committee members confirmed there was one person online but they did not have their hand raised. A committee member identified the online participant as Kate, who was apparently handling technical aspects of the meeting and did not have any questions or comments. No members of the audience were present for public comment, so the meeting moved on to committee comments, with O’Connor indicating they would begin with Sasha.
Committee Member Comments (Link: 00:03:00 – 00:07:00)
O’Connor began committee comments by calling on Sasha, who asked to come back later. O’Connor then called on John Giantis, who yielded his time to the next person.
Suzanne Wright apologized for her language at the previous meeting, stating that she continued arguing for her needs regarding evaluation methods long after the other four committee members had reached consensus. Wright acknowledged that her passion came across as rude and condescending, which was not her intent, and offered her sincere apologies to anyone whose feelings she may have hurt. She noted that she had no other comments because she was unaware of current developments.
A committee member offered condolences to the family of Paul McNaughton, a longtime Swampscott resident who passed away at age 82 the previous week. The speaker described McNaughton as a good person who contributed significantly to the community.
Two speakers, who appeared to be students, discussed upcoming school events. They expressed excitement about the school’s first-ever homecoming dance scheduled for the following day and mentioned that students were looking forward to Thanksgiving break. One speaker reported that a recent art field trip to Mass Art museum had gone well.
A student identified as Sasha provided details about the homecoming event, explaining that the junior class of 2027 and sophomore class of 2028 had planned it together as a fundraising event. The class of 2027 needed funds for prom planning, while the class of 2028 required general funding. The planning process took several months with advisors Mr. Roby and Ms. Russo. When O’Connor asked for clarification about whether homecoming was a dance, the student confirmed it was. The theme was described as “Hollywood under the stars,” with students encouraged to “dress to impress” according to their own interpretation of the theme. The event was scheduled to take place at the school from 6 to 8 PM.
O’Connor concluded the committee comments section and announced that the meeting would proceed to reports and discussions, turning the floor over to the superintendent.
Academic Excellence Award Presentation (Link: 00:07:00 – 00:11:00)
The superintendent introduced the Swampscott High School Academic Excellence Award presentation and called on Ms. Sturma to present the award.
Ms. Sturma presented the certificate for academic excellence to Owen Vegan, describing him as intellectually curious, innately bright, an avid musician, and experienced sailor. Owen has maintained top academic standing in his class while taking the most rigorous course load possible for all four years, including nine Advanced Placement classes. Sturma noted that Owen’s academic achievement is driven by a genuine love for learning rather than competition, and that he is a thoughtful contributor who elevates classroom discussions.
Owen’s passion for science and engineering is evident in his coursework and is leading him to pursue chemical engineering at the college level. He has served as a leader in the Innovation Pathways Advanced Manufacturing program over the past four years, studying engineering, technology, manufacturing, and design. His program will culminate this spring with a 100-hour capstone project.
Outside academics, Owen is actively involved in music as a trumpet section leader in marching band, concert band, and jazz band, and plays bass guitar in a student-run band called Turtle on a String. One notable achievement from his advanced manufacturing work was designing and building a guitar that he uses in the band. Turtle on a String began as a group of eighth graders jamming together and has evolved to have music available on Spotify and perform paid gigs throughout the community as well as at school events.
Owen is also a four-year member of the sailing team and served as captain for two years, working as a sailing instructor during summers. He participates on the math team, which recently won a competition against six area schools, including Marblehead. Sturma concluded by noting that Owen serves as a role model for younger students and is positioned to achieve great things in the future.
After the presentation, committee members took photographs with Owen. O’Connor asked Owen about college plans, noting it was an expected question and expressing confidence he would do well. The superintendent then announced the next agenda item would be a discussion about a Universal Studios trip with Mr. Robing and Mr. Pierce.
Universal Studios Trip Discussion (Link: 00:11:00 – 00:24:00)
Mr. Rovi and Mr. Pierce presented information about the Universal Studios trip, addressing concerns that had been raised. Rovi introduced Kayla, a 2007 Swampscott High School graduate who serves as assistant director for the musical and plays and owns Whimsical Wishes Travel. Kayla has been used to plan, execute, and accompany the school on trips since 2023, including previous trips to New York and Disney.
Rovi explained that the trips provide students opportunities to perform at different venues and receive master classes from musicians worldwide. He described the planning process, noting that extensive preparation occurs before seeking school committee approval. The primary priorities are keeping costs as low as possible while maintaining inclusivity, with prices covering airfare, hotels, meals, and all expenses upfront. Rovi compared their pricing to another North Shore school’s Disney trip at $2,700, noting their mid-price point of $1,800 represents nearly $900 in savings despite one fewer night.
The presenters explained their rooming assignment process, where students are responsible for selecting their own roommates. They provide families with options including quad, double, or suite accommodations to keep costs low. Parents are told they can seek help with roommate selection if needed, but the staff does not assign roommates, believing high school students should have this freedom. They also accommodate families with different needs, such as students who prefer not to share beds.
Kayla discussed the pricing structure, explaining that more people per room reduces individual costs, giving families choices based on student needs and financial considerations. She noted they had received feedback about formalizing a matching process where roommate selections must be mutual, which they plan to implement in writing for future trips, though they currently do this informally.
Rovi emphasized that trips are entirely optional and acknowledged the significant financial commitment for families. The program provides fundraising opportunities, including recent wreath sales where students earned $10 per wreath sold, with one student earning $172. An upcoming Battle of the Bands fundraiser on Monday night will benefit the trip, featuring 13 raffle baskets from the community. The trips are open to all students in grades 9-12 who are enrolled in the relevant classes.
O’Connor noted this was the first time such a discussion had come before the school committee and asked whether parents who raised concerns had been heard. Rovi confirmed they are open to improvements and have offered multiple in-person meetings with parents, though none have been taken up. He stated that all pricing details are presented at informational meetings, with parents expressing that the prices were reasonable. Fifty-four students have registered for the current trip, compared to 52 who went last year.
The superintendent praised Kayla’s attention to detail, citing an example from the New York trip where she ensured dietary needs were met when restaurants initially failed to accommodate students. Rovi contrasted this with their experience with Bob Rogers Travel Agency, which was unresponsive, while Kayla stepped in with six to seven months to plan and delivered excellent results.
The superintendent acknowledged the goal of making trips as inclusive as possible and appreciated the work put into providing these experiences. O’Connor noted that such matters don’t typically come before the school committee but wanted to ensure proper communication was happening. The superintendent emphasized the difficulty and expense of organizing such trips, noting that teachers receive no additional compensation and sacrifice time with their own families. Giantis acknowledged the excellent work done on previous trips, noting that both his children had participated with positive experiences.
Athletic Update Presentation (Link: 00:25:00 – 00:35:00)
A speaker presented an update on the fall athletic season, reporting that 286 high school students and 112 middle school students participated in fall athletics. For winter sports, 173 high school students and 24 middle school students have registered so far, with numbers expected to increase as late registrations are processed. Middle school winter offerings include girls and boys basketball teams.
At the middle school level, the boys cross country team placed first in the league while the girls team placed second. The field hockey team also placed second in their league. The presenter emphasized that providing a positive experience for student athletes is most important at the middle school level.
Five high school teams won Northeastern Conference championships this fall: boys cross country, girls soccer, boys soccer, football, and volleyball. The presenter detailed individual achievements, noting that cross country and golf awards are based on performance at league championships. For boys cross country, Simon Brown and Atticus received all-conference recognition, while Anthony Colella and Lincoln Guinea were named all-stars. Sophomore Annabelle Everett was all-conference for girls cross country.
Other individual recognitions included Jaylis Jacques as cheer all-star, with the team placing third at the competitive Wildcat Invitational in October. Field hockey all-conference was junior Lila Gillard, with all-stars senior Nola Conley and sophomore Shay Connery. Girls soccer all-conference was Greta Seifkin, with all-stars junior Cecilia Tripp, junior Eve Byrne, and junior Jane Raymond. Boys soccer had three all-stars: seniors Milad Sassin, George Spelios, and Nico Croft. Volleyball all-conference was senior Reese Shellberger, with all-stars seniors Marta Sirota, Lila Pastor, and Lauren Paul. Golf all-conference was sophomore Tyler Ostroff with all-star senior Michael Collins. Football awards were not yet available as they are announced after Thanksgiving.
At the state level, Tyler Ostroff finished 12th and Michael Collins finished 17th out of 89 golfers despite challenging weather conditions including rain, wind, and cold temperatures. In cross country’s Meet of Champions, which includes all state divisions, Annabelle Everitt placed 12th and medaled with a 5K time of 19 minutes 22 seconds. The boys cross country team qualified as a team for the Meet of Champions, with several runners achieving personal records, while Everitt qualified as an individual.
O’Connor asked about Everitt’s individual versus team qualification, and the presenter explained that team qualification depends on overall team placement at Division 2, while individual qualification is based on finishing in the top tier individually. The superintendent asked about boys cross country results, and it was clarified that the top seven finishers were from Swampscott at the Division 2 level, which propelled the team to compete at the Meet of Champions.
Regarding boys soccer, the presenter explained that despite winning the conference, the team did not qualify for state tournaments because they competed in the Lynch Division for lower enrollment schools, their power ranking did not place them in the top 32, and they fell one game short of a .500 record, missing both qualification pathways.
The superintendent highlighted that middle school cross country typically has around 100 participants, making it an excellent way for fifth graders to meet friends and integrate into middle school. The presenter noted that of the middle school participants, 24 played field hockey while the rest were cross country runners, requiring two buses for transportation to meets due to the large team size.
Paster thanked the presenter for the report, noting it demonstrates the district’s excellence in both athletics and other activities like band. Giantis shared a story from the cross country dinner about Thomas Arrington, who showed up in street clothes just to cheer on teammates but was pressed into service as an alternate when another runner was unavailable, requiring his mother to bring his uniform and shoes at 6:45 AM. A committee member noted seeing Thomas running around the neighborhood regularly.
Competency Determination Discussion (Link: 00:35:00 – 00:58:00)
Ms. Kent presented information about competency determination requirements following the November 2024 vote that eliminated MCAS as a graduation requirement. She explained that Massachusetts law requires students to have both competency determination and graduation requirements to graduate, and with MCAS no longer serving the competency determination function, school districts must now assume this responsibility. Kent noted that she and Ms. Zotto had previously met with Wright and Contreras to preview this proposal, which is designed specifically for the class of 2026.
Kent explained that the class of 2026 is unique because they took MCAS as sophomores before the law changed, so their scores can still count toward competency determination. The proposal includes three pathways: MCAS scores covering about 75% of current seniors, a combination of MCAS in some subjects and coursework in others covering another 19%, and district-certified courses meeting 9th and 10th grade standards for the remaining students. The state also requires an appeals process for students who do not receive competency determination.
For English Language Arts competency, students can use their MCAS score or complete coursework in English 1 and English 2, or the special education course English 9/10. To demonstrate mastery, options include participating in assigned interventions, achieving equivalent grade 10 scores on iReady assessments, passing final grades in required courses, or passing subsequent courses in the sequence. For mathematics, the requirements include MCAS scores or completion of Algebra 1 and Geometry, with Algebra 1 taken in 8th grade counting toward the requirement. Science competency requires biology or any other lab science course.
Kent addressed multilingual learners, noting that most are enrolled in English coursework alongside English language development courses, and newcomers transition to having both types of courses, allowing them to meet the same qualifications as other students by graduation. For special education students, accommodations include specialized instruction, assistive technology, transition planning, and alternative ways to demonstrate competency, though some students may still not graduate with a diploma if they cannot show mastery of 9th and 10th grade standards.
The appeals process would involve a panel including school counselors, department heads, and school and district administration, chaired by the principal. The panel would review cases such as students with unusual transcripts from transfers, particularly those from countries with different educational systems. If appeals are denied at the panel level, they would go to the superintendent for final review.
Looking toward the future, Kent indicated they would return with another plan for subsequent classes, noting that US history will be added as a requirement starting with the class of 2027. The district is considering requiring MCAS participation (though not passage) for graduation to maintain the required 95% participation rate for district accountability. They are also exploring additional pathways for demonstrating competency, though Kent noted that the state may develop solutions through a governor’s task force and DESE committee.
Kent reported that approximately three students are currently in courses needed to meet competency determination and are performing well, while about 12 students remain uncertain for meeting the requirements. The plan must be submitted to DESE and posted on the district website by December 31st if approved by the committee.
O’Connor asked whether the same students would be at risk even if MCAS remained a requirement, and Kent confirmed this would likely be the case or potentially worse. O’Connor inquired about the additional burden on schools, and Kent explained that while districts previously had graduation requirements with MCAS handling competency determination, they now must ensure courses are truly aligned to state standards, representing a significant shift in responsibility from the state to individual districts.
A committee member asked about MCAS participation requirements, and Kent clarified that requiring participation would help maintain the district’s 95% participation rate needed for accountability ratings, while also allowing students to qualify for scholarships and the seal of biliteracy. Giantis asked about timeline milestones, and Kent explained that with graduation in May, most determinations are already made except for the 12 uncertain students, making it difficult to implement additional requirements for the current senior class.
Wright noted that for future classes, the district would identify students needing additional support by the end of 10th grade. Kent acknowledged the complexity of transfer students, particularly those from different educational systems or English language learners. O’Connor asked about special education students, and a speaker (likely Martha, based on context) emphasized the importance of multiple pathways and flexibility, noting that IEP processes can sometimes waive graduation requirements when appropriate.
The speaker explained that out-of-district placements at state-approved schools would receive Swampscott diplomas and must follow state competency requirements through their placement schools, not Swampscott’s specific requirements. She emphasized the importance of maintaining meaningful diplomas while providing flexibility through multiple pathways and universal design principles, noting that common assessments would be critical to avoid subjectivity issues.
O’Connor asked about homeschooled students, and Kent explained that the district is not responsible for those students. Kent also noted that previous students who may have graduated had it not been for MCAS requirements could apply for competency determination, but would receive a 2026 diploma rather than a diploma from their original graduation year, with eligibility limited to students from 2013 onward when current standards were implemented.
Graduation Requirements and Competency Determination Discussion (Link: 00:58:00 – 01:03:00)
Paster expressed appreciation for the presentation and noted greater concern about the class of 2027 than 2026, since the district has a plan for the remaining 12 students in the current senior class but may not have enough time to address issues for the 2027 cohort. He asked about legal requirements for outreach to students from 2013 to 2024 who did not graduate, and Kent confirmed there is no requirement for outreach, only to have a plan if former students contact the district. Kent mentioned that during their Friday meeting, Wright had suggested possibly placing information in the newspaper.
Paster asked about the breakdown of the 12 remaining students between general education and special education. Kent responded that none of the 12 are general education students, noting they are all either multilingual learners or students with disabilities. Paster acknowledged the significant work involved in the proposal and expressed interest in seeing the plan for the class of 2027, noting that while the current year presents challenges, it is more straightforward than next year’s situation.
Paster referenced discussions about potential changes at the state level, noting that larger districts tend to favor standardized testing like MCAS while smaller districts generally do not. Kent agreed that educators need time to develop alternative assessment methods beyond creating new tests, emphasizing that the point of the vote was to move away from testing-based requirements.
Wright clarified that the committee needed to vote on the competency determination document for DESE submission, noting it was an internal document rather than a school committee policy. She explained that the committee would eventually need to review Swampscott High School graduation requirements, as current policy references meeting state requirements rather than specifically addressing competency determination, and future policy would need to explicitly state requirements for both credits and competency determination.
O’Connor entertained a motion to approve the competency determination for the class of 2026 as proposed. Wright moved the motion, Paster seconded it, and the committee voted unanimously to approve. Kent thanked the committee and acknowledged Ms. Zotto for her significant contributions to the work on the proposal.
Clark School Future Use and Decommissioning Discussion (Link: 01:03:00 – 01:33:00)
O’Connor initiated a discussion about Clark School, noting that this was the first time a school building had remained in the school budget after no longer serving as a school. She explained that the building was originally intended to house administrative offices and the early learning center, but this plan was no longer moving forward as formally acknowledged at the previous week’s mini summit. O’Connor expressed her opinion that the committee should vote to decommission the building and return it to the town, arguing that the school department lacks experience in managing empty buildings or serving as a landlord, and that future discussions about swing space should involve the town rather than just the school department.
Wright responded that the facilities director should be part of this conversation, noting that when MSBA evaluated all district buildings, they specifically wanted Clark to remain open and available. She explained that MSBA’s interest was related to potential middle school needs, viewing Clark as a usable building that wasn’t too old. Wright questioned whether it mattered if the town or school department owned the building for swing space purposes, noting concerns about the building’s suitability for middle schoolers due to elementary-sized features like bathrooms. She acknowledged the building would be perfect for preschool use.
O’Connor referenced Marblehead’s Eveleth School as an example of a building that served as swing space for various town needs, including the library renovation, but was managed at the town level rather than the school level. Wright noted that Marblehead’s 18-22 special education program had used that building for an extended period.
The superintendent reported that the recreation department is now covering some costs, with the school department paying approximately $20,000 to $35,000 for major maintenance items like boiler or roof repairs, while the recreation department handles day-to-day maintenance and damage from their use.
Paster acknowledged MSBA’s clear direction to retain the building and praised the recreation department’s success in running programs there, noting heavy usage based on the number of cars he observed. He suggested the recreation department should pay more to the school department given their increased programming and revenue generation, potentially zeroing out the school department’s maintenance costs.
Wright proposed decommissioning the building while establishing a memorandum of understanding giving the school department priority access for swing space needs over a 20-year period. She noted this would save the town money by reducing the need for portable classrooms or alternative swing space arrangements. A committee member supported this idea, noting it would address the renovation of the middle school, which is the biggest ticket item, while allowing the recreation department to continue generating income through programs and rentals.
Paster supported the MOU concept, noting that when residents understand the full cost difference between renovation and new construction with state reimbursement, opinions often change quickly. Wright suggested the agreement could potentially include both preschool and recreation department use, as moving preschool out of the middle school would provide space for repairs and classroom reorganization.
A speaker, likely Martha based on context, noted additional complications with preschool relocation, including the need for dedicated administrative and nursing staff, which would increase costs. Wright emphasized the need for space regardless of whether middle school work involves complete renovation or staged improvements.
O’Connor suggested this discussion should occur through the tri-chair meetings that were agreed upon for more frequent multi-board conversations. She noted that information about MSBA recommendations should be shared with select board and finance committee members who weren’t present for those discussions. O’Connor mentioned that Katie Feelan had suggested the school committee simply needed to decommission the building, though O’Connor couldn’t recall if they had formally voted to decommission Hadley School.
The superintendent clarified that Clark would accommodate only one grade level as swing space, not the entire middle school, and noted that any statement of interest submission would determine whether MSBA recommends renovation versus complete rebuild, which would significantly impact space needs. He emphasized that all Clark discussions must begin with middle school decisions and understanding both school committee and select board positions on submitting a statement of interest.
Wright discussed the town’s financial health as the most complicated aspect, noting that former town administrator Sean Fitzgerald had worked for years to position the town financially for a major school project. She explained that the current town administrator needs time to assess long-term financial health, including bond ratings and borrowing costs, before committing to a statement of interest that would obligate the town to build a school if accepted.
The superintendent noted that the MSBA application window opens in January, which is why facilities director Max would present to the committee in December. Wright emphasized the tight timeline, with the window closing in April and requiring substantial documentation, meaning decisions would need to be made by February at the latest.
A committee member reported that the town administrator had presented budget projections showing a $2 million deficit, though this was described as a rough early projection. Paster noted the town’s high excess levy capacity, ranking second highest in Essex County, which should be part of budget discussions.
The discussion concluded with O’Connor agreeing to bring the Clark School matter to the tri-chair group for broader conversation before February. The superintendent noted it was past 7:30 PM and suggested the student representatives could leave if desired, given the late hour and upcoming homecoming dance. O’Connor then moved to close the Clark School discussion and transition to the chemical health policy topic.
Chemical Health Policy Review (Link: 01:33:00 – 01:51:00)
The superintendent explained that the district’s chemical health policy for non-school related events is more restrictive than for school-related events, which seemed problematic. He noted that the policy includes “constructive possession” for non-school events, a term he found unclear but interpreted as being in the presence of alcohol or appearing in photos with alcohol even without drinking, similar to old MIAA rules. The superintendent expressed concern about schools policing weekend and off-campus activities unrelated to school, citing his experience as a principal dealing with weekend incidents that had nothing to do with school but became major issues on Monday mornings.
Wright explained that they had raised this issue due to confusion, and the superintendent was consulting legal counsel. She noted the policy currently states that violations may result in disciplinary action and that students are responsible for rules of other organizations like MIAA. Wright described incidents where students vindictively report others, such as rival school students posting information before games, and emphasized that the policy should focus on school-related activities rather than policing outside events.
The superintendent compared the situation to fights, noting that while schools can address fights occurring in school, they have limited ability to address fights happening on weekends in other locations. O’Connor confirmed that under the current policy, the school would need to address such incidents. The superintendent noted that their policy is more restrictive than MIAA standards, explaining that MIAA had changed their bystander rules so students not drinking but present at parties would no longer face consequences, while the district’s policy had not been updated accordingly.
Wright indicated they were waiting for legal counsel KP to provide language clarifying that the policy applies to school-related events, with non-school events being parental responsibility. The superintendent confirmed he had asked legal counsel about coverage regarding outside organizations and the implications of removing non-school event language from the policy.
Paster acknowledged his strong previous stance on the issue, referencing a 2011 incident involving bullying and alcohol that led to attempts to implement a bystander policy. He expressed belief that party attendance should have consequences but acknowledged being potentially wrong, especially given that their policy exceeds MIAA standards. Paster agreed the policy should be updated to align with MIAA standards while maintaining that incidents eventually impacting school become the school’s responsibility.
Wright clarified that when incidents impact school operations, they become the school’s problem, but until then, they remain the responsibility of parents, guardians, or property owners. She noted that students remain responsible for rules of organizations they belong to, including drama clubs, National Honor Society, and MIAA, with complaints directed to those organizations rather than the school.
The superintendent emphasized that removing disciplinary consequences didn’t mean doing nothing, suggesting that schools could contact families when students are suspected of party attendance, encouraging counselor conversations and parental discussions. He noted the contradiction between wanting students to be social and get off phones while potentially punishing them for attending parties where they choose not to drink.
A speaker, likely Martha based on context, explained that constructive possession likely remained in the non-school section due to a proofreading error when it was removed from school-related sections. She noted the difficulty for principals to investigate off-campus incidents and the challenges posed by AI-generated photos making evidence verification nearly impossible. The speaker emphasized that supportive measures and family notification would always be the first response regardless of investigation outcomes, as supervision is the primary tool for preventing incidents.
The speaker stressed that while schools can provide safety measures during school hours, most incidents occur outside school, making parent notification and partnership crucial for student safety. She noted collaboration with school resource officers as another avenue for community safety and emphasized that the district’s primary role is education, not spending extensive time on investigations that could be handled through family communication.
A committee member supported the safety-focused approach, noting that parent notification would prompt increased supervision and help rebuild trust when it has been broken. The speaker confirmed that students would be informed that any reported incidents would result in parent notification regardless of validity, ensuring transparency in the process.
The superintendent reiterated that while the district doesn’t condone underage drinking, incidents outside their domain should not fall under school jurisdiction. The speaker concluded that communication and parental partnership are the primary tools for keeping students safe, acknowledging that even well-educated students may make poor decisions despite understanding the risks.
The committee agreed to wait for legal counsel’s response before making any policy changes, with the superintendent indicating he would bring the matter back when appropriate.
Actions and Votes (Link: 01:51:00 – 01:53:00)
O’Connor moved to the actions and votes portion of the meeting, presenting a donation from the Weatherspoon Foundation in the amount of $3,000 to be used by Jim Pierce for chorus, chorale, or any other program. Paster made a motion to approve the acceptance of the $3,000 gift. O’Connor confirmed with the superintendent that the same protocols remain in place for official thank you letters from his office for all donations received, which the superintendent confirmed. A committee member seconded the motion, and the committee voted unanimously to approve the donation.
O’Connor then presented the approval of regular session minutes from November 6th and policy subcommittee regular session minutes from November 14th as a single vote. Paster moved to accept the minutes, a committee member seconded the motion, and the committee voted unanimously to approve both sets of minutes.
At 7:53 PM, noting they were running slightly behind schedule, O’Connor entertained a motion to adjourn. Paster made the motion to adjourn, a committee member seconded it, and the committee voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting.
All About Town provides all information in a good faith effort to improve community engagement and awareness. However, text is generated by artificial intelligence, and we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information provided herein. Use of the site and reliance on any information on the site is solely at each individual’s own risk.