Click Below for Additional Meeting Resources;
Meeting Opening and Public Comment (Link: 00:00:00 – 00:00:00)
Chair Dan Fox called the meeting of August 13, 2025 to order and opened the floor for public comment. No members of the public were present in person or online to provide comment. A speaker noted that L. Jones was on vacation. Fox then moved the meeting to the town administrator update with Thatcher Keezer.
Town Administrator Update on Cove Lane Property Dispute (Link: 00:00:00 – 00:05:00)
Town Administrator Thatcher Keezer provided an update on the Cove Lane property dispute in the neck area. Keezer explained that the property has been known for many years as providing public access to the beach and waters for Marbleheaders. However, the ownership of the property has come into question, with a resident claiming private ownership and attempting to restrict access through Cove Lane.
According to Keezer’s understanding, the property did not transfer to sole Marblehead ownership in transactions from the 1930s or 1950s, but rather remains under joint ownership of the abutters to the lane, which would allow those abutters access to the property. The resident’s attorney disputes this interpretation, claiming total private ownership. The town council is currently working on the issue, conducting research on deeds and records, and communicating with the resident’s attorneys to determine the actual ownership disposition.
Keezer stated that the town is hoping to avoid conflict at the site and would prefer people not try to engage and resolve the issue on their own, allowing the legal process to work through the facts based on records. Chair Fox emphasized that the community sentiment strongly supports keeping the access open and that the town will fight hard to ensure the right of access. Fox noted that ownership does not necessarily preclude use by other people and stressed that the town is not walking away from the issue.
A committee member pointed out that the dispute could set a precedent, noting that real estate concepts from 100 years ago were completely different regarding paths, roads, and ownership. Another committee member asked for clarification about whether anyone had sought relief or declaratory judgment in the courts, and Keezer confirmed that so far the matter involves only correspondence between attorneys. The committee member echoed the sentiment that the town should vigorously defend the public’s right to use the property.
Town Administrator Update on Cliff Street Boatyard and Rail Trail Project (Link: 00:05:00 – 00:07:00)
Keezer reported that the town has received a clean bill of health on the Cliff Street boatyard cleanup work. The cleanup contracts addressed liquids, oils, and other contaminants that were in the soil from years past. The work has been remediated and completed, with the town receiving at least a draft permanent solution with no condition statement from the Department of Environmental Protection, indicating there is no need to put any restrictions on the use of the property.
Keezer announced a ribbon cutting ceremony for the Smith Street rail trail crossing scheduled for August 26th at 4:00 PM. This section of the trail is referred to as the trial showcase project, serving as a prototype to demonstrate how the town plans to set up the remaining sections of the rail trail, including establishing dimensions and materials. The project represents collaborative work between community development planning staff, public works, and municipal light departments. Keezer encouraged public attendance at the ribbon cutting to see the prototype and provide feedback, noting that public input is encouraged and that the project marks another milestone in the town’s overall rail trail efforts.
Conservation Commission Interviews and Appointments (Link: 00:07:00 – 00:20:00)
Fox announced that the committee would conduct interviews for Conservation Commission openings, with two applicants: Allison Fry and Brandon Collins. Fox explained that there are three vacancies – two three-year terms and one two-year term. The interview process would involve calling each applicant individually while the other stepped outside to prevent copying answers.
Allison Fry was interviewed first. She introduced herself as having moved to Marblehead about two and a half years ago and working at Salem Sound Coastwatch as the associate director. Her work involves habitat restoration, eelgrass and salt marsh restoration, wetland protection, and coastal resilience grants. She mentioned that one of her first projects was an eelgrass under floating dock study investigating the impact of floating docks on eelgrass habitat off Naugus Head, for which she studied Marblehead’s wetland bylaws.
When asked about her interest in serving, Fry explained that since setting down roots in Marblehead, she wanted to be more involved with the town and felt she had knowledge to offer regarding eelgrass restoration, wetland protection, and coastal resilience work. Regarding potential conflicts with other boards, she stated she would focus on enforcing the bylaws and Wetlands Protection Act while being consistent across rulings. She had attended a Marblehead Conservation Commission meeting in July and had presented at other North Shore conservation commissions. To familiarize herself with the role, she planned to access Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commission resources, including webinars and training materials. On conflicts of interest, she acknowledged potential issues with her eelgrass work and stated she would recuse herself from certain votes when necessary.
Brandon Collins was then interviewed. He introduced himself as being from Lake George, New York, where his mother worked as a limnologist studying freshwater and its interaction with water basins and upland development. He had grown up interning for various Lake George organizations and was involved in writing upland development codes for New York State. Collins moved to Marblehead in 2015 and works in real estate. He expressed his desire to protect the town and watershed, stating that witnessing some inappropriate actions over recent years motivated him to apply.
Collins explained his interest in serving by emphasizing the importance of protecting the watershed and ensuring real estate development is done correctly. He referenced the Watershed Protection Act as providing specific guidelines that must be adhered to regardless of outside pressure. While he had not attended a conservation commission meeting, he had dealt with them through client projects and had been encouraged to apply by Chris Meal, a board member. Collins stated he would familiarize himself with the role by reading extensively, talking to people, and shadowing other members. Regarding conflicts of interest with neighbors or real estate clients, he drew on his experience growing up with his mother in a similar role, explaining the importance of finding ways to make things right without forming enemies while maintaining respect.
After the interviews, the committee discussed the appointments. A committee member noted that there were two three-year terms available and suggested appointing both candidates to three-year terms despite Collins’ comment about preferring freshwater. Fox made a motion to appoint both Allison Fry and Brandon Collins to the Conservation Commission with terms expiring in June 2028. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Council on Aging Term Limit Policy Change (Link: 00:21:00 – 00:26:00)
After some discussion about agenda order, Fox moved to address a Council on Aging policy change request. Lisa Hooper appeared online and Marcy Schwalm was present in person to discuss a change that the Council on Aging board had voted on June 12 to approve, changing the length of board service from two three-year terms to three three-year terms before members would have to leave the board and reapply.
Schwalm provided background on the request, explaining that the Council on Aging board had originally been a nine-member board but was reduced to seven members around the time she joined, just before COVID, because typically only seven people showed up to meetings. She noted that some members, including herself, got a late start due to COVID, and the board felt they had made significant progress over the past couple of years. The board believed that requiring members who wanted to continue serving to take a year sabbatical and then reapply and interview with the Select Board would be disruptive and cause a loss of continuity.
The proposed change would allow active members to serve three three-year terms before having to leave and reapply, which would be at year ten. Schwalm noted that she doubted many members would seek a fourth term, and some might opt out after one or two terms, but the board wanted the option available. A committee member asked about term staggering, and a speaker confirmed the terms are staggered. The committee member noted that most appointed boards do not have term limits, making this change more consistent with standard practice.
Fox asked if the board had considered eliminating term limits altogether, and Schwalm responded that they had discussed it but were unsure if they could do that, noting the policy had not been reviewed in thirty years. Fox asked if a vote was needed, and a committee member confirmed that final approval was required according to the policies. Fox called for a motion to approve the change in operational policies for the Council on Aging to change the length of board service from two three-year terms to three three-year terms, and the motion was approved.
Shin Dynasty License Revocation Hearing Continuation (Link: 00:26:00 – 00:37:00)
Fox opened the continued public hearing regarding the revocation of the wine malt beverage license held by Shin Dynasty at 1 Atlantic Avenue, which was continued from November 13, 2024. Fox welcomed Mr. Lewis back and noted that the committee had received his email update and a recent update from Kyle indicating some progress since August 5th.
Lewis reported that there had been a long negotiation period between their contractor and landlord, which caused delays, but they came to an agreement and signed a contract at the end of the previous month. The contractor had begun work, and Lewis stated he had been checking on progress almost daily. The firewall was almost complete at the floor level and through the ceiling, though some basement work remained to complete it from basement to top. For the ADA entrance, they had to reframe the door because it was not large enough and order an electrified door. Lewis noted the electrified door was at the business but not yet installed, and framing work was ongoing.
Lewis explained that their contractor had given a rough timeframe of one to three months to finish everything, including both the landlord’s and tenant’s work, starting from when work began. A committee member asked about other outstanding components, and Lewis listed the floor installation, ceiling tiles, and reinstallation of appliances and bathroom fixtures that had been removed.
Fox acknowledged that before hearing about the work starting, he had been inclined to move toward revocation, but given that a building permit had been pulled and work had started, he was willing to continue the process. He suggested returning for the September 10th meeting for another update. A committee member asked about Lewis’s expectations for acceleration, and Lewis expressed hope that work would move seamlessly from the landlord’s portion to their portion without delays, noting he was trying to stay on top of the contractor.
The committee clarified that Lewis was waiting for the landlord’s work to be finished before their work could begin. Lewis explained that the contractor was a friend of his sister-in-law and also knew the landlord personally, which he felt was encouraging for getting the project completed. A committee member asked about the division of responsibilities, and Lewis confirmed the landlord was responsible for completing the firewall in the basement, installing the electrified ADA door, smoothing the floor from the entrance, and creating a flush hinge for a basement entrance hatch.
Lewis explained how they reached this situation, noting this was their second contractor. The building department had discovered there was no firewall between his business and the adjacent business at the end of October, making the firewall the landlord’s responsibility. When the firewall issue arose, they were also required to install an ADA entrance. The ADA entrance took considerable time because the architect had difficulty finding a suitable location and sought variances from the city and state to install it at the back door. The state required them to return three times, meeting in January, February, and the end of March before receiving approval.
Fox asked if everyone agreed to continue the hearing until the September 10th meeting, and the committee concurred. Fox expressed hope that Lewis would return with progress and that at least the landlord’s portion would be completed, giving Lewis control over the remaining work. Fox made a motion to continue the revocation hearing until September 10th and require an update at that meeting, which was seconded and approved unanimously.
Chief Procurement Officer Appointment (Link: 00:37:00 – 00:44:00)
Fox welcomed Allison Jenkins as the new Chief Procurement Officer and noted that many people in town were excited about her appointment. Jenkins provided her background, explaining that she had 19 years of experience in municipal government and was a resident of Hamilton. She started working for Hamilton performing chief procurement officer duties while also serving as a select board member. Jenkins then worked in Reading for almost 10 years as Chief Procurement Officer before moving to the city of Everett, where she discovered that city government was very different from town government.
Jenkins explained that when she saw Marblehead had posted the position, it appealed to her because she had grown up in Winthrop and missed being near the water, often visiting Marblehead when in the vicinity of Winthrop. She was particularly interested in returning to a town form of government. Fox welcomed her and noted they had heard good things throughout the process.
Keezer expressed excitement about having someone with direct experience in the procurement function. He explained that in Marblehead, the chief procurement officer role had previously been split with the town planner position, with Becky wearing multiple hats. The workload had become incredible with all the transactions and projects occurring. Having a subject matter expert focused solely on procurement would result in better contracts and processes, while allowing other department heads to focus on their core functions rather than procurement tasks. Keezer noted that department heads would still play a significant role in defining scope and participating in the process, but Jenkins would manage the procurement aspects. He mentioned there was significant pent-up demand that flooded into the new office during her first week.
Jenkins confirmed she was accustomed to centralizing procurement functions, as Reading had a similar situation to Marblehead where procurement was not centralized, and she was the first to centralize it there. She expressed excitement about the role and compared herself to a kitchen contractor with everyone waiting to get their projects done. A committee member noted this appointment was part of Keezer’s plan to make government more efficient through centralized services.
When asked about differences between city and town government, Jenkins highlighted resident involvement as a major distinction. She noted that in towns, having to get resident votes and support for municipal government work was very different from fulfilling the desires of one person at the top in a city structure. The discussion touched on town meetings and special town meetings, with Jenkins noting she was surprised Marblehead did not have special town meetings.
Fox made a motion to appoint Allison Jenkins as Chief Procurement Officer with a term to expire in June 2026. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Zero Emission Vehicle Policy and Green Communities Program Presentation (Link: 00:44:00 – 01:08:00)
Fox introduced Logan Casey, the town’s sustainability coordinator, to present on the zero emission vehicle policy draft and the Green Communities program. Casey explained that the presentation would combine both agenda items, starting with the Green Communities program to provide context for the zero emissions vehicle procurement policy.
Casey provided an overview of the Green Communities program, which offers technical assistance and funding to municipalities for energy efficiency and carbon reduction projects. Created by the legislature in 2008 with first designations awarded in 2010, about 300 of the state’s 351 municipalities have applied. The program has distributed approximately 54 million dollars in designation and competitive grants, with over 30 municipalities securing more than one million dollars each.
The benefits include an initial designation grant of 150,000 to 700,000 dollars for eligible projects such as energy conservation measures, HVAC equipment like heat pumps, LED lighting, building controls, EV charging and vehicle procurement, and technical support. After designation, communities become eligible for competitive grants of up to 225,000 dollars every six months. The program also opens additional Mass Clean Energy Center programs for residents and businesses, including building decarbonization studies and vehicle-to-grid technology programs.
Casey outlined past town actions leading to consideration of the program, beginning with Town Meeting’s adoption of Article 45 in 2018, which committed the town to 100% carbon-free energy in production, building use, and transportation with fiscal responsibility. In 2023, with help from the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, the town developed a net zero roadmap formalizing the Article 45 goal and setting a net zero greenhouse gas emissions target by 2040. Becoming a Green Community was identified as a goal in this roadmap due to the financial support it would provide.
There are five main requirements for Green Community designation, plus an additional requirement for municipal light plant communities. Marblehead has completed three of five criteria: as-of-right zoning for renewable energy facilities, permitting processes of one year or less for renewable energy facilities, and adoption of the Massachusetts Stretch building code in 2018. The remaining requirements are an energy efficient vehicle procurement policy and developing an energy reduction plan with baseline energy use.
For municipal light plant communities like Marblehead, an additional requirement is adopting a renewable energy charge. Casey had presented this to the Light Board, explaining that since Marblehead doesn’t automatically pay into the fund supporting Green Communities, they need to add a charge of 0.5 mil of a cent per kilowatt hour to ratepayers, working out to about five to six dollars per year for an average family of four. A committee member confirmed this was solely the Light Board’s decision and asked about the money’s destination. Casey explained it goes indirectly to the Renewable Energy Trust, which distributes funding for clean energy projects through Mass CEC.
Casey then detailed the zero emissions vehicle first policy, explaining it serves both as a Green Communities requirement and as a standalone procurement policy aligned with the town’s net zero goals. On-road vehicles contribute 36% of Marblehead’s community carbon emissions, making it the second largest source after buildings. With 15 years to reach the 2040 net zero goal and town vehicles averaging 15-year lifespans, the timing is critical. The town fleet includes about 170 vehicles, with half being light duty vehicles targeted by this policy.
The policy establishes a hierarchy for vehicle procurement: first considering electric options, then plug-in hybrids with all-electric operation capability, then hybrids, and finally conventional vehicles when other options aren’t feasible. It sets minimum fuel efficiency standards based on current EPA standards and targets light duty vehicles under 8,500 pounds, which have many commercially available electric or hybrid alternatives. Heavy duty vehicles over 8,500 pounds, emergency response vehicles requiring 24/7 operation, and off-road construction vehicles are currently exempt.
The policy would begin in fiscal year 2027, allowing time for staff communication and planning. Support would come from Casey and the new Chief Procurement Officer, with access to state contract procurement for better deals and communication materials for municipal staff. Casey is working with the MASS Fleet Advisor program to analyze the entire fleet and provide transition recommendations, available rebates, and charging installation guidance. The Green Marblehead Implementation Committee is developing a municipal fleet transition plan including charging strategy.
The second remaining Green Communities criterion is an energy reduction plan committing to reduce municipal building energy use by 20% over five years. This involves conducting an energy baseline for 2024, which has been completed, and having consultant Power Options develop a reduction plan recommending specific strategies and projects per building, prioritized by savings potential. Projects could include insulation, lighting, building controls, and HVAC equipment.
Casey requested Select Board feedback on the zero emissions vehicle first policy and noted the energy reduction plan should be ready in October. The Light Board had requested that the Select Board reaffirm support for applying to Green Communities, as the original support was given when the net zero roadmap was adopted in May 2023. The application deadline is December 2025, with applications accepted every six months thereafter.
A committee member asked about cost considerations in the “where feasible” language of the policy. Casey confirmed cost would be a factor, noting that in recent procurement discussions with the health director and building commissioner, hybrid vehicles actually cost less than conventional ones with available incentives. Casey emphasized the policy provides flexibility for cost and operational limitations while maintaining the goal of transitioning toward zero emissions vehicles, with decisions made through conversations between the sustainability coordinator, town administrator, and procurement officer.
Green Communities Program and Zero Emissions Vehicle Policy Discussion (Link: 01:08:00 – 01:25:00)
A committee member praised Casey’s presentation and expressed support for the laudable objectives, noting that most initiatives except net zero are independent from base load electricity costs. The committee member raised concerns about fiscal responsibility, questioning whether accepting grants might create additional costs or pressure on the community, emphasizing the need to be aware of potential long-term costs when state subsidies end.
Casey responded that the Light Board would need to adopt the renewable energy charge for program participation, which would cost about 50,000 dollars annually based on 2024 usage, while the town would receive an initial designation grant of 150,000 to 170,000 dollars plus eligibility for competitive grants. Casey noted that the energy reduction plan would provide a prescriptive list of cost-reducing projects like insulation and heat pumps, with Marblehead benefiting from lower electricity costs than surrounding utility communities.
Keezer added that most incentives target capital investment portions to facilitate operational savings, citing Steve Cummings’ hybrid truck achieving phenomenal fuel mileage due to local short trips with significant battery use. Keezer noted from personal experience that electric vehicle charging costs about one-third of gasoline costs. A committee member emphasized the importance of stating and underscoring the operational cost savings case.
A committee member asked about the current electric vehicle count in the light duty fleet. Casey confirmed there are two fully electric vehicles out of approximately 90 light duty vehicles, plus some hybrid police cruisers. The committee member inquired about price differentials, and Casey explained costs vary by model, with examples like Ford Transit versus Ford E-Transit having about 2,000 to 3,000 dollars difference. Casey noted that federal tax credits are ending but Massachusetts offers 3,000 to 7,500 dollars in incentives through the MOR-EV program, plus the policy includes considerations for charging infrastructure.
The committee member clarified that financial feasibility would include total cost of ownership analysis, not just upfront costs, factoring in annual savings over the vehicle’s lifetime. Another committee member noted historical challenges with vehicle availability even when departments budgeted for hybrid vehicles, emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and noting differences between municipal and consumer markets.
A committee member provided feedback on the policy’s vehicle transfer restrictions between departments, citing examples of transferring old police cars or trucks to school departments. Casey acknowledged this concern, noting it was also raised by Andrew Petty at the Green Committee. Casey explained the policy sets guidelines for transfers to ensure vehicles meet energy efficiency standards if kept in the municipal fleet longer, but includes exemptions and waiver processes through the sustainability coordinator and town administrator.
Fox suggested taking time before the next meeting to review the policy and provide additional comments. Isaac Chewed from Bayview Road provided public comment, noting he drove an electric vehicle to the meeting and highlighting savings from regenerative braking. He mentioned Ford’s announcements about 30,000 dollar vehicles and vehicle-to-home power capabilities, then asked how 3A compliance affects funding.
Casey responded that the town has been communicating with Department of Energy Resources regional coordinator Dylan Patel about the application. Casey explained that for competitive grants available every six months, MBTA community compliance is definitely a factor affecting eligibility. For designation grants, it remains a gray area with DOER working out their official stance, though Casey expected more details by the next discussion.
Fox noted this should be considered when asking ratepayers to spend money and commit to the program without knowing the full impact, affecting timing decisions. Keezer explained that state agencies haven’t developed consistent policies across different programs regarding 3A compliance, requiring manual review of each grant program. The committee requested periodic updates on this issue, and Fox thanked Casey for the presentation before moving to the next agenda item.
Marine Corps 250th Birthday Celebration Event Planning (Link: 01:25:00 – 01:37:00)
Grader presented details about a Marine Corps 250th birthday celebration event resulting from a petition by Seth Moulton with Grader’s participation to be part of Marine Week occurring in Boston. He explained that Marine Week is the Marine Corps’ way of approaching communities in certain regions to celebrate the 250th birthday of the United States Marine Corps.
Grader read a portion of the event description, explaining that Marine Day in Marblehead on August 21, 2025, would honor the U.S. Marine Corps on its 250th anniversary while highlighting Marblehead’s common cause with the Marine Corps in devoted service to the nation. The event would be held during Marine Week in the Boston area at Fort Sewell, which defended the town during the Revolution and provided covering cannon fire for the USS Constitution with its detachment of 60 Marines against two British frigates during the War of 1812.
The celebration would also highlight Marblehead’s unique role in the American Revolution, particularly General John Glover’s Marblehead regiment, the first militia to volunteer for Washington’s Continental Army at Cambridge in June 1775. The event would mark the 250th anniversary of the commissioning of the schooner Hanna out of Marblehead, the first ship commissioned by General George Washington in September 1775 for armed interdiction of British shipping. The ceremony would honor Marine veterans and all veterans who served in common cause throughout the nation’s history as it approaches the 250th anniversary.
Grader emphasized that Marines take birthday celebrations seriously to honor Corps history, traditions, and sacrifice to the country, reaffirming the Marine Corps motto of Semper Fidelis, including fidelity to the form of government for the people and by the people. The ceremony would take place on Thursday, August 21st, from 4:30 to 6:00 PM at Fort Sewell.
The event would feature the Quantico band from Washington D.C., the Marine Corps silent drill team, a flyover of likely four F-18 jets, and a cake cutting ceremony. There would also be a Marine rock band performing later at the landing. Grader clarified that this was a Marine-sponsored event with the town providing the venue, parking, and safety while the Marine Corps handled everything else. He noted that the F-18s would have GE engines built with local talent from Lynn, Massachusetts.
Fox referenced a letter from Chief King requesting closure of parking spots on Fort Beach, with a provided map showing parking restrictions and Marine bus parking at Old North and near Little Harbor. Keezer confirmed that Ted Moore had arranged two spots for two buses and that restrictions would be in place early because the band would arrive for practice runs.
A committee member asked about promotion and publicity for the event. Grader explained there was a two-tiered effort with the Marine Corps publicizing broadly throughout the area and John Guilfoyle, the town’s media specialist, developing content. Keezer added that Guilfoyle’s company was contracted for website hosting and communication services, and they were coordinating with Marine PR for the event. He noted they were waiting for official authorization before going fully public and were setting up social media account access.
Grader mentioned there was coverage in the current edition about the landing, and Keezer noted the Marines had already done a press release and would live stream the event on the Marine network worldwide. Due to space limitations at Fort Sewell, a large monitor would be placed below the entrance on Front Street for those who couldn’t get into the fort.
Fox made a motion to approve the use of Fort Sewell on Thursday, August 21, 2025, for the Marine Corps 250th Birthday Celebration event, subject to approval from police and fire, receipt of required certificate of insurance, and authorizing Grader to coordinate and sign required documents. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Fox then made a motion to approve temporary parking regulations on Chief King’s recommendation for the August 21st event, including restrictions on Fort Beach parking spaces from noon to 6 PM, public parking spaces from Franklin Street to Fort Sewell from 2 to 6 PM, posted signage by DPW, and blocking Front Street from Franklin Street to traffic from 2:30 to 6 PM, with times subject to change based on public safety needs. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Finally, Fox made a motion to prepare a citation in honor of the Marine Corps 250th birthday, which was seconded and passed unanimously. Fox thanked Grader for his work on the event, and Grader responded that it was his honor and pleasure.
Select Board Goals Review and Adoption (Link: 01:37:00 – 01:49:00)
Fox introduced the Select Board goals review and possible vote, explaining that this was material discussed at their retreat about a month ago. Keezer and a committee member had put together and distributed a summary of what was discussed, with objectives broken down into different goal areas including good governance, communication and public engagement, finance and budgeting, capital planning and investment, community quality of life, workforce and human resources, and community development and economic growth, with subsections under each area.
A committee member explained that the document was an effort to summarize the understanding and takeaways from the retreat meeting, hoping people had a chance to review it and make corrections if things were not represented as remembered or desired. The idea was to put these goals down concretely and formally adopt them for the year. The committee member suggested they could go through changes now if there were only minor wordsmithing needed, or continue the discussion if people needed more time.
A committee member noted it looked like a good summary and communication tool. Fox agreed it was representative of their discussions and suggested it could be posted on the website under Select Board goals. A committee member noted some formatting issues when sharing on OneDrive but said the substance could be formally adopted if everyone was comfortable with it.
Grader raised questions about implementation in a strategic way, asking who does what and where, referencing the GFOA document. He suggested the GFOA document could isolate each strategic initiative by department and break down either guidance from the Select Board or bring up potential strategic needs for funding. Grader noted that GFOA documents organized by department could co-locate budgeting with strategic initiatives and their implementation.
A committee member asked if Grader wanted to align the goals with the GFOA process first. Grader explained he wanted to ensure alignment between top-down Select Board priorities and individual department priorities that would implement the initiatives, since anything prioritized as a strategic initiative needs funding. He expressed concern that strategic plans often get written and published but nobody looks at them, advocating for alignment with money and implementation.
The committee member asked if Grader wanted to take a draft version and fold in what would fall into the GFOA process. Grader suggested that when Keezer sits down with departments for quarterly or yearly planning, there should be a sense of a plan that ties into Select Board desires. The committee member suggested Keezer could take the document and fold it into appropriate areas, noting not all items would flow into the GFOA process.
Fox noted this was a framework allowing Keezer to know their goals, and many items were policy-driven rather than financial. Grader agreed, noting policy-driven items fall under the Select Board department. Fox suggested they could approve the goals and then address next steps about which ones go into the GFOA process.
Keezer explained this was the first step in the strategic planning cycle, with the executive level setting direction for the organization. He noted that as they go into the next budget cycle and policy matters, this provides direction for focusing on initiatives. Department goals would be aligned with these Select Board goals during the budget process, which would be reflected in the GFOA-formatted budget.
Grader agreed but emphasized that strategic planning is iterative, wanting to understand the range and limits of what’s possible so the Select Board can be informed about goal setting within a realistic context. He noted the goals were reasonable given Keezer’s familiarity with town operations. Keezer confirmed they had reported on prior year goals at retreats, checking off accomplished items and determining status of ongoing goals, which feeds into the next iteration.
Grader added another endorsement for having GFOA breakdown of individual departments with budgets and strategic goals, calling it a valuable information tool for residents who could easily find what departments have done and addressed. Fox agreed it provided a quicker summary than other formats, and Grader noted it was well-organized despite being a relatively large document.
Fox asked if everyone wanted to move forward with approval and made a motion to approve the Select Board goals as presented for 2025. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
National Opioid Litigation Settlement Agreements (Link: 01:49:00 – 01:55:00)
Keezer provided background on the National Opioid Litigation Consortium settlement, explaining that lawsuits were filed against principal entities assigned responsibility for the opioid epidemic that affected the country. Settlement agreements were made with different entities through a consortium of attorneys representing public entities, with attorney generals in various states organizing to deal with the lawsuits and attorneys collectively representing municipalities.
Keezer explained that there are multiple agreements already in place from which Marblehead is already receiving payouts, with additional settlements being made over time or updates to existing agreements like the Purdue Pharma case. The process involves guidance from the legal consortium representing municipalities and recommendations from attorney generals. The Massachusetts Attorney General provides guidance and recommendations to municipalities, who can either continue lawsuits individually or agree to be party to the conglomerate settlement negotiations. On the Attorney General’s advice, Marblehead is taking the settlement path.
The current request involves settlements with nine different entities and asks for authorization for Keezer, as the designated municipal representative, to interact with and sign off on agreements. The authorization covers three specific actions: voting on the Purdue plan as an additional settlement with Purdue, signing the governmental entity settlement agreement for the Sackler Agreement, and authorizing signed participation in a nine-defendant settlement agreement involving multiple entities including Sandoz.
Fox noted there appeared to be no downside and the agreements would allow the town to receive settlement funds. A committee member asked about implications for Massachusetts and Marblehead in terms of potential settlement amounts. Keezer responded that the town has already received upwards of 330,000 dollars, not counting recent email notifications of additional wire transfers coming into the account.
Keezer explained that the settlement money comes with specific requirements for use, including community education and prevention programs, treatment services for substance use disorders, recovery housing and support services, distribution of life-saving medications such as naloxone, and public health infrastructure and training. The town has established a working group of public safety and health personnel with a strategy of identifying three focus areas from the approved list and funding entities that already provide these services rather than attempting to deliver services directly, recognizing the town lacks the bandwidth and expertise for direct service delivery.
Fox made three motions for the required authorizations. The first motion authorized the Town Administrator to vote on behalf of Marblehead to approve the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy plan including the 6.5 billion dollar Sackler family settlement as recommended by the National Opioid Litigation Consortium, with the vote to be submitted via email by the September 23, 2025 deadline. This motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
The second motion authorized the Town Administrator to execute the governmental entity settlement agreement for the Sackler release on behalf of Marblehead by the September 30, 2025 submission deadline using the DocuSign platform provided by Rubris. This motion was also seconded and passed unanimously.
The third motion authorized the Town Administrator to execute all required participation forms on behalf of Marblehead for opioid settlement agreements with Alvigen, Amneal, Apotex, HIKMA, Mylan, Sun Pharmaceuticals, and applicable Sandoz entities as recommended by the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office. The authorization included completing the process using the DocuSign platform provided by the Settlement Implementation Administrator Rubris and a separate portal for Sandoz if applicable, in accordance with the October 1, 2025 participation deadline. This motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Host Community Agreement Assignment for Cannabis Retailer (Link: 01:55:00 – 02:07:00)
Keezer provided background on the host community agreement assignment request, explaining that Marblehead has two host community agreements in place for adult retail cannabis sales, one of which is with Seven Leaf Sisters. He noted that licensing is done through the Cannabis Control Commission at the state level with extensive vetting, while local municipalities are required to enter into host community agreements that set local terms.
The existing agreement with Seven Leaf Sisters involves a scheduled transaction for KCCS LLC, doing business as Cannabis Culture, to buy out or purchase Seven Leaf Sisters and take over all existing terms of the host community agreement. KCCS already operates in Northampton, which was the first municipality to open a cannabis retail shop. The transaction was expected to go through the following day, with an upcoming Cannabis Control Commission meeting to vote on approving the transaction.
Keezer proposed a vote to authorize the transfer of the host community agreement from Seven Leaf Sisters to KCCS, contingent upon Cannabis Control Commission final approval. He indicated that KCCS would maintain all terms and employees, essentially continuing business as usual with what the company was doing or intending to do.
Fox confirmed this represented no change to what was approved in 2021, only a change in ownership. Keezer confirmed it was a transfer of ownership that required authorization at the local level. A committee member asked about current operations and renewal frequency. Keezer explained that neither of the two cannabis retailers had opened yet, and the agreements were five-year terms signed six months to a year apart, with expiration dates more than a year out.
The committee member questioned obligations to go back to market if shops weren’t opening, noting that potential retailers might see Marblehead’s two slots as filled despite no operations. Keezer explained that after reviewing the agreement terms, there was no mechanism to pull the host community agreement before expiration for lack of opening, though there had been mechanisms for early requirements like zoning. The town would have to wait until current agreements expire to have options.
A committee member asked about automatic expiration and renewal conditions. Keezer confirmed there were expiration dates and didn’t recall seeing automatic renewal language. He explained that many entities statewide with host community agreements haven’t been able to open due to market saturation after the industry’s initial popularity, making the situation not unusual.
Keezer noted that when agreements expire, the town could look at options, and suggested checking in with Mark Chakara, the other applicant, to see if he wanted to release his agreement. A committee member asked about renewal rights and termination options. Keezer explained that upon expiration, the license expires with that applicant, but the town always maintains two slots, allowing for reapplication by existing holders and opening to others.
Keezer noted the town’s interest in active participation since they receive 3% of sales, though the state has heavily restricted impact fees since the industry’s early days. He explained that the cannabis industry went from illegal activity to heavily regulated legal business, with initial overcautious approaches giving way to more comfortable acceptance as the industry matured and didn’t produce feared impacts.
Fox questioned language in the amendment document referring to a host community agreement dated June 14, 2024, and amended July 22, 2024, when the original agreement was from 2021. A committee member suggested this might be due to required amendments for cannabis law compliance. Keezer agreed to check the language and correct any date errors.
Fox made a motion to approve the assignment of the host community agreement from Seven Leaf Sisters Inc. to KCCS LLC through an amendment agreement contingent upon Cannabis Control Commission approval, noting the amendment would not take effect until closing. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously, with agreement to verify the correct dates before signing.
Administrative Business and Board Actions (Link: 02:07:00 – 02:15:00)
Fox announced a School Committee vacancy notification received on August 8 from Al Williams, chair of the school committee, regarding Brian Oda’s resignation effective July 31st. In accordance with Massachusetts General Law, the school committee voted to declare the seat vacant. Fox proposed opening applications for letters of interest and resumes with a deadline of September 5th and holding a joint meeting with the school committee on September 10th to interview applicants. Fox made a motion to accept letters of interest and resumes for the School Committee vacancy and hold the joint meeting, with submissions to be sent to both the Select Board at Abbott Hall and Al Williams at Marblehead Public School Administration. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Fox presented consent agenda items for approval, including Old Town House Revolution 250 Community event for September 20-21, 2025, subject to usual requirements; Dollars for Scholars 10th annual Run for the Fun 5K Road Race on October 5, 2025, subject to police and fire approval and various conditions; shanty renewal for Mark Lozier for 2025-2026; wedding ceremony request from Aaron Martin at Abbott Hall for August 1, 2026; Old Town Hall event for Wings Women Discovery Presentation on September 5, 2025; and minutes from July 9, 15, and 23, 2025. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Fox requested approval to declare surplus equipment at the police station, including a precision solar control valued at 100 dollars in scrap metal and a 2017 Ford Explorer. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Fox presented a one-day liquor license application for the Friends of the Council on Aging for Wednesday, August 28, 2025, from 4:30 to 6:30 PM at the Judy and Jean Jacoby Community Center. The license was subject to various conditions including a 50 dollar fee, proof of authorized alcohol purchase from Cappy’s Importing, and compliance with General Law Chapter 138. The motion was seconded and a roll call vote was conducted, with all members voting in favor.
Keezer provided background on three contracts requiring approval. The first was a time extension for the records digitization project with no additional cost, the second was for Getchell’s Playground sporting lighting paid through the Recreation Park Revolving Fund, and the third was for police station flooring paid through Article 8 of Town Meeting 2025. Fox made separate motions for each contract: amending contract 2024-063 with Metasource LLC to extend performance until June 30, 2026; awarding contract 2025-01 to Ham Electric LLC for 21,750 dollars; and awarding contract 2025-ASH-017 to County Floors Inc. for 14,234 dollars. All three motions were seconded and passed unanimously.
Fox noted a letter of interest for Old and Historical Commission vacancies from Michael Hall, with two vacancies available for one full and one alternate member. Fox proposed opening applications with a deadline of September 19th and interviews on September 24th. Similarly, for two Taxation Aid Committee vacancies with two letters of interest received, Fox set the same deadlines of September 19th for applications and September 24th for interviews.
A committee member announced a Council on Aging dedication event for the park behind the Council on Aging building, featuring bocce courts and landscape architecture, scheduled for the following week from 4:30 to 6:30 PM with music and refreshments.
Fox requested sending condolences to the families of Rose Collins, a former Conservation Commission member who played Taps for hundreds of veterans and was mother to Teresa and Amy, and Jim Devine, a lifelong Marblehead citizen and firefighter, both of whom had passed away the previous week. Fox asked for a letter of condolence from the board recognizing their dedication to the town. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Fox made a motion to adjourn the meeting, which was seconded and passed unanimously.
All About Town provides all information in a good faith effort to improve community engagement and awareness. However, text is generated by artificial intelligence, and we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information provided herein. Use of the site and reliance on any information on the site is solely at each individual’s own risk.