See AI Disclaimer at Bottom
Click Below for Additional Meeting Resources:
Meeting Opening and Public Comment (Link: 00:00:00 – 00:00:00)
Fox called the meeting to order on Wednesday, October 22, 2025, and announced that the meeting was being recorded. He opened the meeting with public comment, asking if there was any public comment before starting the meeting and whether anything was available online for public comment. A speaker responded that there was nothing yet. Fox confirmed there was no public comment and moved on to the town administrator update.
Town Administrator Update (Link: 00:00:00 – 00:19:00)
Thatcher Keezer, Town Administrator, began with positive news about state earmarks secured through the work of Representative Jenny Armini and Senator Creighton. Despite a challenging state budget, the town received $50,000 for repairs and irrigation at Waterside Cemetery and $35,000 for updated firearms training for the police department. Keezer noted that these earmarks had been cut during the process but were restored after the representatives advocated for the town.
Keezer then reported on grant applications submitted through the One Stop and Coastal Zone Management grant programs while the town was compliant under Chapter 3A. The grants covered various projects including harbor projects, Abbott Hall attic improvements for historic storage, rail trail projects, Washington Street corridor enhancements between Five Corners and downtown, Coffin School reuse, downtown parking study, vacant storefront tax credit program, and the State Street land and Tucker Walk resilience project. However, after the town went out of compliance following a referendum vote, all these grants totaling $2,816,493 were deemed ineligible.
Fox asked whether the town would continue applying for grants despite non-compliance. Keezer responded that his position with staff is to keep applying for everything, as the state is still determining which grants are affected by Chapter 3A compliance requirements across different agencies. A committee member asked about the Abbott Hall project, and Keezer clarified it involved improving the attic space for proper historic storage with environmental controls, not elevator upgrades. The committee member noted that some projects, particularly the resiliency project, would eventually need to be completed regardless.
Fox inquired about the vacant storefront tax credit program, and Keezer explained it provides incentives for local businesses to grow the commercial base. A committee member suggested the need to determine when to pursue alternative funding through debt exclusion overrides, noting the town’s natural debt capacity requires prioritization of capital planning. Keezer mentioned that staff is preparing for a historic building debt exclusion to address deteriorating historic buildings that need immediate care.
Regarding the Village Street bridge, Keezer reported the town is pursuing funding through the Transportation Improvement Program via the Metropolitan Planning Organization. The project has achieved 25% design and is now working toward 75% design funding, which would advance it to the next phase for construction funding. A committee member asked about compliance concerns, and Keezer confirmed it was unclear whether non-compliance would affect their eligibility, though he suspected issues might arise at the final funding stage rather than during the design process.
Keezer provided updates on approved projects, noting that the Council on Aging roof project and Mary Alley building roof project are moving forward. The Mary Alley project is expected to take about four weeks, with some parking limitations due to construction staging.
For the Coffin School reuse project, Keezer outlined the process steps. The planning department gathered input from municipal departments for potential uses, held a public meeting with immediate neighbors to hear their concerns first, and issued a request for information to potential developers for redevelopment ideas. Another general public meeting is scheduled for the first or second week of November. All input will be compiled by the planning department to draft recommendations for the request for proposals, with presentation to the select board expected by the end of the calendar year.
Fox confirmed there would be ongoing public input opportunities throughout the process. Keezer explained that even after a developer is selected, there are additional opportunities through the planning board and permitting process to address construction concerns raised by neighbors. Fox mentioned receiving a summary of neighbor concerns from Susan on behalf of the neighbors, noting reasonable concerns about blasting, asbestos removal, and other construction impacts. Fox also learned from resident Steve Elliott about former wetlands in the playground area.
A committee member asked about selection criteria and evaluation processes for the RFP. Keezer confirmed that Allison Jenkins, the procurement officer, is a main player in putting the RFP together. Fox noted that neighbors requested a transparent scoring system. A committee member emphasized the importance of capturing and aggregating community requests and preferences, referencing the Gary School Reuse Committee experience where fiscal benefits drove the redevelopment decision. The committee member mentioned that four departments requested use of the space: Parks and Recreation for a dog park, Electric Light for battery storage, housing, and cemetery expansion. Fox noted additional citizen suggestions including a farm, and discussion continued about who would participate in the scoring process, referencing the public nature of the previous reuse exercise.
Fiscal Year 27 Revenue Forecast (Link: 00:19:00 – 00:55:00)
Fox introduced the fiscal year 27 revenue forecast agenda item, noting that Aleesha Benjamin, Finance Director, was present along with Alec Goolsby, Finance Committee Chair, who was participating online. Benjamin explained this was the annual October financial process in preparation for the December three-year forecast, focusing on revenues at this time.
Benjamin presented property tax and debt exclusion projections, showing fiscal year 25 actuals, fiscal year 26 budget, and fiscal year 27 projections based on Proposition 2½ cap. Property taxes bring in approximately $2.2 million year over year and account for 80% of the town’s revenue. She reported that state aid increased for the first time in fiscal year 26 by $30,360, with projections of 1% increase for fiscal year 27. Enterprise indirect costs were estimated at 3% increase.
Benjamin detailed state aid increases of $315,183, with the majority going to Chapter 70 funding for schools due to the Student Opportunity Act changes from fiscal year 24. Unrestricted general government aid increased by only $15,424, which she described as negligible. She noted that state aid is not keeping pace with inflation or increasing budget costs.
Local receipts showed a decline from $10 million in fiscal year 25 actual to $8.1 million projected for fiscal year 27. Fox asked about historical trends, and Keezer explained that previous budgets significantly underestimated local receipts to generate free cash, but they changed to legitimate estimates using 95% of the last three-year average of actual receipts.
A committee member asked about motor vehicle excise tax decreases and interest income. Benjamin explained that motor vehicle excise taxes fluctuate with the economy, generating maximum revenue when people buy new cars with higher first-year assessments. Economic uncertainty causes people to delay purchases, affecting tax revenue with approximately a one-year lag. She noted recent record sales in September due to tariffs and expiring electric vehicle tax credits.
Benjamin detailed various revenue categories including penalties and interest on taxes, payments in lieu of taxes, charges for services, and departmental revenues. She highlighted that trash disposal revenue increased by $200,000 due to more facility stickers being sold, and rental income increased significantly due to renegotiated medical building rent agreements. License and permit revenue was reduced based on building commissioner input about declining new construction.
Earnings on investment showed significant decline from $2.5 million to projected $1.5 million, with current targets around $800,000-$900,000. Benjamin explained that interest rates dropped from 5% to 3.75% with further reductions expected, and the town is spending down ARPA funds, reducing the balance available for interest generation. Fox clarified this represented only general fund interest, not total interest income.
Benjamin projected total local receipts at $8.1 million, representing roughly $700,000 decline, approximately 20% reduction. A committee member noted this was a significant decrease, and Benjamin emphasized the need for conservative estimates to avoid revenue shortfalls. She explained that federal funding changes also impact these projections.
Benjamin summarized that property taxes bring in roughly $2.3 million with the 2.5% cap, with reserves for overlay increasing due to additional veterans and senior exemptions passed at town meeting. Free cash projections showed $7 million used in the budget, down from $5.5 million in fiscal year 25 actual, with expectations of $5 million and estimates of free cash generation between $4-6 million.
Fox asked about assumptions for free cash allocation toward capital and reserves. Benjamin explained the variable nature, noting that decisions about allocating portions to capital and reserves would affect the amount available for operating budget. She clarified her projection of $4-6 million generation, with potential allocation of $1 million back to free cash reserves.
Benjamin presented total revenues of $109,244,857, which is $514,000 less than the previous year. She outlined major cost pressures including $800,000-$1 million increase in trash contract, 14% rise in health insurance with double-digit increases, and inflation above 3% outpacing the 2½% property tax cap. She noted that GLP-1 drugs and Massachusetts’ aging population using expensive hospitals are driving health insurance costs higher.
Benjamin summarized that fiscal year 27 revenue is projected to decline by $514,641, with expenses growing faster than revenue since 2020. She highlighted 9% pension increases, 14% health insurance, and personnel costs all growing above the 2½% cap. ARPA funding will be fully spent by end of 2026, with fewer federal grants and MBTA 3A non-compliance limiting state funding access.
Benjamin warned about ongoing use of free cash to balance budgets, noting the state advises against this practice as it’s unstable and should be used for capital needs instead. She indicated the next step would be a general override, noting the town hasn’t had one since 2005 to sustain high-quality services.
Fox asked about the 14% insurance increase timeline. Benjamin clarified they have until December 1 to decide whether to stay with the Group Insurance Commission, with rates provided after commitment. She explained that Massachusetts health insurance rates exceed national averages, requiring participation in state-specific seminars rather than relying on national data.
A committee member asked about state aid projections given federal funding cuts. Benjamin explained she uses 1% as a preliminary conservative estimate. Keezer added that state aid is primarily driven by lottery receipts with municipalities getting a capped percentage, providing some protection, though federal cuts could lead to 9C cuts affecting municipalities indirectly.
Fox commented on assumptions and cautioned about the $5 million free cash number, emphasizing the need to allocate money toward capital and reserves according to select board financial policies. A committee member noted the need to wean off free cash usage while making countervailing commitments.
Goolsby provided Finance Committee perspective, sharing a data collection template covering fiscal years 21-27. He explained that property tax levy grows at nearly 3% annually, while debt exclusion property taxes are revenue neutral as they fund specific debt payments. He noted overlay increases and state aid’s consistent 1% growth pattern.
Goolsby highlighted that local receipts projections represent about 80% of fiscal year 25 actuals, indicating conservative but not excessive estimates. He noted meals and rooms excise generated $700,000 in its first full year but is budgeted flat at $600,000. Earnings on investment peaked in fiscal year 24 when interest rates were highest, with current $800,000 estimate considered accurate.
Goolsby explained that the $2 million property tax increase is reduced to $1.3-1.4 million net increase after factoring in decreased local receipts. Free cash certification is expected earlier this year but at a lower amount, potentially $2-3 million less than last year’s $9.5 million. He outlined major expense pressures including 3-4% salary increases, insurance benefits, pension expenses increasing nearly $1 million annually, and the trash contract potentially increasing the budget by $800,000-$1 million.
A committee member asked about salary projection progress. Goolsby explained they have templates and contracts in place but need to finalize with schools, noting the complexity of basing projections on funded positions versus requested positions. Benjamin confirmed departments were informed of level-funded budget requests with only contractual cost justifications allowed, with all budgets due November 17.
Fox clarified that level-funded means the exact same amount as last year, even though reality may require less. Goolsby noted that certain departments with few employees will need budget increases for contractual obligations, requiring offsetting cuts elsewhere.
A committee member asked about meals tax projections. Benjamin explained she kept it conservative at $200,000 due to potential economic decline affecting restaurant spending. Fox noted the limited historical data for this revenue source.
A committee member expressed concern about comfort levels with free cash allocation versus reserves, noting they didn’t fund OPEB last year and may not be able to this year. They highlighted concerns about bond rating reviews when reserves and stabilization funds are low. Benjamin agreed about the need for stabilization fund reserves, noting the state’s advice against using reserves to balance budgets.
A committee member emphasized the unsustainability of using free cash to balance operating budgets, noting that 80% of the budget goes to wages, with 14% health insurance increases and inflation over 3% while living within 2½% growth limits. They stressed the need to get off the “free cash carousel” due to reaching dangerously uncomfortable reserve levels.
Benjamin shared that she had distributed the MMA Perfect Storm report detailing fiscal pressures facing cities and towns. Fox thanked Benjamin and Goolsby for their work and noted the collaborative efforts with school staff. The meeting prepared to move on to the next agenda item.
OPEB Presentation (Link: 00:55:00 – 01:11:00)
Fox welcomed the OPEB consultant, who introduced himself as representing a firm established in 1998 that works with over 500 municipalities across 37 states, Europe, and South America. The consultant explained that GASB (Governmental Accounting Standards Board) implemented accrual accounting and OPEB valuations to create standardized comparisons between municipalities, moving away from pay-as-you-go systems. He described the calculated discount rate model that prevents municipalities from arbitrarily choosing rates, instead using five factors including municipal bond rates, annual investment amounts, current assets, investment strategy, and annual payouts.
The consultant reported that the town’s OPEB liability decreased from $151 million last year to $147 million currently, noting this was positive news despite the discount rate declining. He explained that the town is approaching peak liability as a percentage of budget, as Massachusetts and New England are mature states with aging demographics and limited population growth. He characterized current budget conditions as “the glory days” that won’t improve due to demographic trends, noting the U.S. fertility rate of 1.6 and lack of net migration to the area.
The town’s assets increased from $4.5 million to $4.9 million with an 8.9% rate of return, resulting in the unfunded liability decreasing from $147 million to $142 million. The funded rate of 3.37% places the town at the 25th percentile statewide, meaning it performs better than 25% of peer municipalities. The discount rate dropped from 5.74% to 5.51%, primarily due to decreased expected future returns by asset class, which the consultant explained occurs when markets perform well, leaving less available for future earnings.
The consultant identified 19 people over age 65 remaining on active health care plans rather than Medicare plans as a significant liability factor, adding approximately $7 million to the total liability. The service cost, representing benefits earned by active employees during the year, totaled about $3.3 million, or $5,200 per employee. He described this as deferred compensation payable in the form of medical benefits in retirement, similar to pension plan service costs.
Positive factors included higher than expected turnover, which reduced liabilities by $10 million, and decreased numbers of retirees and covered spouses, cutting liabilities by $13 million. Negative factors included the discount rate decrease, which increased liabilities by $4 million, and premium increases exceeding expectations, adding $2.6 million in liabilities. The consultant noted that the projected 14% health insurance increase was actually relatively good news, as he was seeing increases of 15-20% with some reaching 30% elsewhere.
The consultant outlined key actuarial assumptions including discount rates, termination rates, retirement probabilities, coverage election rates, and healthcare cost inflation. He explained that the liability primarily consists of comprehensive medical benefits, with dental and life insurance being minimal factors. Current costs include $1,100 monthly for single active plans and $671 for Medicare supplement plans, with family plans costing approximately $32,000 annually compared to the national average of $27,000.
Comparing the town to geographic and demographic peers, the consultant showed that while the town’s 5.51% discount rate was similar to some communities like Newburyport, others like Boxford and Danvers had higher rates. Most peer communities had significantly higher funded ratios due to contributing more money over time. He noted that to reach the 90th percentile, towns need approximately 60% funding, while the 50th percentile requires about 10% funding.
The consultant presented a 30-year projection showing the OPEB liability growing from $145 million to $450 million in nominal terms, but explained that in present value terms discounted at 3%, the liability remains relatively flat at around $146 million, declining to $140 million. Pay-as-you-go costs for retirees would fluctuate from $6 million to $7 million and back to $6 million, indicating that the liability as a percentage of budget should remain stable if the town can afford current retiree healthcare costs.
The consultant explained that Massachusetts is a “top-down state” that limits municipal flexibility compared to other states where he works. The state fixes retirement eligibility, limits charges beyond 50%, and restricts changes to spouse coverage and other benefit modifications. He noted that while Medicare Advantage plans might seem attractive, providers have been pulling out of various markets, including Vermont where coverage is now limited to seven counties.
A committee member asked about how towns address the massive liability and timeframes for adequate funding. The consultant recommended treating pension and OPEB as one overall retirement liability, setting an overall retirement funding budget where OPEB receives funding after pension obligations are met. He suggested that when pension systems become fully funded around 2054, those funds could transfer to OPEB funding, though he acknowledged this requires long-term commitment across multiple administrations.
Benjamin announced that she would submit a funding plan to Keezer, noting they would not allocate 100% of freed pension funds due to current and future budgetary constraints. A committee member asked about measures of progress, and Benjamin referenced the town’s financial policy of contributing funds annually, which helps stabilize rather than grow the liability. The consultant emphasized that the problem requires a series of small changes over time, particularly focusing on Medicare supplement plans and prescription drugs where the largest costs exist. He noted that while changing healthcare plans is difficult, that’s where the most significant savings potential lies.
A committee member commented that many towns are “kicking the can down the road” and expressed the need to see what a funding plan would look like. Fox thanked the consultant for the presentation.
On Call Plumbing Inspector Appointment (Link: 01:11:00 – 01:13:00)
Fox introduced the agenda item for appointing an on-call plumbing inspector, Nelson Gagnon, with Steve, the building commissioner, present to discuss the appointment. Keezer explained that the town has been fortunate that their plumbing inspector doesn’t take much time off or get sick often, but the current inspector is scheduled for knee replacement surgery in a week and needs backup coverage. He noted that having a backup plumbing inspector is actually required by law.
Keezer reported that he had worked with Nelson Gagnon in the city of Salem and described him as very experienced and seasoned. He noted that Gagnon serves as a backup plumbing inspector in several other towns, enjoys the work, and is both knowledgeable and personable. Keezer stated that he believes the town is more fortunate to have Gagnon than Gagnon is to have the opportunity with them, noting that Gagnon is not doing the work primarily for financial reasons but stepped up when the town needed someone.
Fox commented that the appointment seemed straightforward and noted that he had read Gagnon’s resume, which showed him to be well qualified. Fox made a motion to appoint Nelson Gagnon as on-call plumbing inspector with a term to expire in June 2026. A committee member seconded the motion, and it was approved unanimously.
Harbors and Waters Board Interviews and Appointments (Link: 01:13:00 – 01:29:00)
Fox introduced the Harbors and Waters Board interviews and appointments, noting there was one vacancy for an alternate member with a one-year term and three applicants: Matthew Burke, Andy Garnet, and John Lucas. Fox explained the interview process, stating that each candidate would be interviewed individually while the others waited outside to avoid hearing other responses. After each interview, candidates could stay to listen to subsequent interviews, followed by discussion and voting.
Matthew Burke was interviewed first, introducing himself as a 14-year resident who previously worked as a captain before moving into logistics and currently serves as director of transportation for DSG Logistics in Peabody. Burke described himself as a passionate boater whose family has always owned boats and whose daughters were raised on boats in Marblehead. He expressed interest in participating despite being somewhat introverted.
When asked about significant harbor issues, Burke identified lack of funding for the State Street project, the possibility of an override, problems with docks on the Village Street side that weren’t fully addressed, and the need to explore additional revenue streams for the enterprise fund. He confirmed attending one or two meetings the previous year and described his budgeting experience in his current transportation role, managing annual budgets and revenue generation.
Burke discussed his boating experience, noting he keeps power boats on the west shore and uses them year-round. He observed increased harbor patrols and suggested improvements including better boater education, town-provided information about upcoming boating license requirements, and ways to involve more children in boating. He noted seeing fewer children on small boats in the harbor compared to when he grew up.
Regarding public access to the water, Burke analyzed the disparity between west shore and Marblehead harbor, noting 1,200 vessels serviced by four launches on the west shore versus 1,800 moorings with twelve launches in Marblehead harbor. He suggested possibilities including additional rings at docks, rings on Village Street floats that sit in mud, and more opportunities for public launches.
Andy Garnet was interviewed second, introducing himself as a resident of 8 Partless Street who works as a commercial construction estimator and project manager handling jobs from $10 million to $150 million. He applied to get involved in town government and felt his skills might fit the harbors and waters board role.
Garnet identified key issues as maintaining harbor access for everyone and addressing climate change impacts, emphasizing the need to allocate money to preserve the harbor and maintain universal access. He had not attended meetings but had spoken with board member Rick Husner. Garnet highlighted his project management experience and involvement with the Maddie’s Anglers Club, where he organizes events with the harbor master, including cleaning up Parker’s boatyard and hosting family-oriented fishing events.
Regarding harbor improvements, Garnet emphasized education, particularly with the new boating license law. Having held a mooring since age 18, he observed increased wake problems in the harbor over the past ten years due to less experienced boaters. He suggested incorporating education into the mooring application and renewal process.
When asked about budget experience, Garnet described twenty years of experience building, maintaining, and fixing budgets in commercial construction. For public access improvements, he suggested utilizing Parker’s boatyard and proposed creating some form of boat club access in Marblehead, noting that everyone wants to be in the harbor despite options available in Salem, Danvers, and Beverly.
John Lucas was interviewed third, introducing himself as a Salem native raised in Marblehead who attended local public schools and Virginia Tech for computer engineering. He currently works as a contractor at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, working on electronic systems for Los Angeles and Virginia class submarines with a team of engineers.
Lucas described his maritime engineering background, including projects in Quincy and Braintree, environmental robotics work, and reef surveying robots tested in Marblehead Harbor. He mentioned taking John Payne’s marine shop class in high school and coursework at Northeastern’s Marine Biology Center in Nahant. He expressed passion for public service, ocean conservation, engineering, and the town.
When asked about harbor issues, Lucas referenced reviewing 2025 meeting records and identified environmental erosion on State Street and Cliff Street, irrigation problems at the landing, and algae problems particularly toward West Shore Drive. He characterized the erosion problem as the biggest issue based on past meeting discussions, acknowledging budget constraints and the $500,000 funding loss due to Chapter 3A non-compliance.
Harbors and Waters Board Appointment Interviews and Selection (Link: 01:30:00 – 01:41:00)
Singer thanked Lucas for being present and asked if he had attended any board meetings or spoken with current board members. Lucas responded that he had not been able to speak with anyone on the board or attend meetings, but had watched past sessions online, including both harbors and waters board meetings and school committee meetings. He explained that his work schedule keeps him out of the house 12-13 hours daily, including driving time, and he’s not allowed to have phones at his workplace, but he’s making efforts to get involved.
When asked what expertise he would bring to the board, Lucas highlighted his background as a systems engineer, explaining that his specialty focuses on high-level project planning, resource procurement, requirements analysis, cost analysis, and stakeholder communication. He emphasized that his project experience is specifically related to ocean environments, which he felt would be valuable for the harbors and waters board.
A committee member thanked Lucas for his naval service work. When asked about initiatives he’d like to see implemented in the harbor, Lucas discussed both coastal and boating perspectives. He identified moorings as difficult to obtain and noted challenges with boat launching, particularly at Riverhead where boats can only launch at high tide, and difficulties at the little harbor area. He suggested that easier boat launching locations would be beneficial, though acknowledged the complexity of implementing such solutions given traffic and event constraints.
Regarding budget experience, Lucas confirmed he has budgeting responsibilities in his current job, having spent approximately $200,000 on materials alone, plus experience budgeting for man hours and materials in past projects. When asked about increasing public access to the water, Lucas mentioned fishing lanes in the neck area that are available to the public but not well-known. He referenced an ongoing issue where someone is claiming beach access as private property and suggested the town could better publicize where public water access is available.
Fox made a motion to place all names in nomination for the alternate member vacancy, which was seconded and approved. Fox explained the voting process: each member would nominate one candidate in a roll call vote, with the candidate receiving a majority of three votes being selected. If no majority was achieved, a second round would be held with the top two vote recipients.
Singer commented that all three candidates would add tremendous value, highlighting Burke’s logistics and customer service background, Garnet’s project management experience, and Lucas’s engineering background that would be valuable for liaising with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. She encouraged those not selected to continue volunteering as the board would be experiencing natural succession over the coming years. A committee member echoed these sentiments about the difficulty of choosing among such qualified candidates.
Fox noted that the decision came down to identifying the biggest void to fill on the current board, emphasizing that all skill sets were valuable but the goal was creating a well-rounded board. In the roll call vote, Fox voted for Burke, citing his commercial captain’s license and transportation business experience. Singer also voted for Burke, emphasizing the need for balance and his logistics management background.
A committee member voted for Burke as well, referencing his finance background and logistics management experience, giving Burke a majority. Another committee member voted for Garnet, citing his budgeting expertise and complex project management skills. Fox indicated he would have also voted for Garnet, noting his experience with the anglers club and finance background.
Fox congratulated Burke on his appointment and thanked Garnet and Lucas for their participation, encouraging them to stay involved in town government either with this board or others. He noted that all positions are volunteer-based and there are many opportunities to contribute expertise and common sense to town operations. Fox informed Burke that he would need to be sworn in by visiting the town clerk before his first meeting.
Council on Aging Board Appointment Interview (Link: 01:41:00 – 01:44:00)
Fox introduced the Council on Aging interview and appointment, welcoming Suzanne Gale as the candidate. Fox asked Gale to tell them about herself, noting they had her resume and cover letter, and to explain why she wanted to be part of the Council on Aging.
Gale introduced herself as a Marblehead resident of over 50 years, noting that her age automatically makes her a member of the Council on Aging demographic. She described having extensive experience in finance and nonprofit board work, and highlighted her involvement with the Council on Aging board since 2012, serving on both the Friends of the Council on Aging and the Council on Aging board itself. Gale expressed strong commitment to the Council on Aging, describing it as an incredible community asset and stating she wanted to dedicate her time to this commitment because she found it needed and worthwhile.
Fox indicated he had no questions for Gale, and no other committee members posed questions. Fox commented on her extensive volunteer background, referencing her work with Children’s Plan and Families at the YWCA among other activities, and stated the town was fortunate to have her apply for the position. A committee member thanked her for her continued service.
Fox made a motion to appoint Suzanne Gale to the Council on Aging with a term to expire in June 2028. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously. Fox thanked Gale for her service and the meeting prepared to move to the next agenda item.
Veterans Services Update and POW Chair Discussion (Link: 01:44:00 – 01:52:00)
Fox welcomed Commander Ron Knight and introduced the Veterans Services update, beginning with the Veterans Day ceremony on November 11th. A speaker explained that the ceremony would follow the same format as the previous year, keeping it simple with Commander Knight having three speakers lined up, pending confirmation from one. Grader agreed to do the proclamation, and commitments were secured from the chaplain, chorus director, and Mr. Collins for taps. Following the ceremony, attendees would go to the VFW for brunch. The speaker noted this event would occur the day after Congressman Moulton’s event, which had been moved to 6:30 PM.
The speaker provided an overview of recent and upcoming events, noting a successful Wreaths Across America event the previous Saturday. Veterans services has been busy with claims significantly increasing due to expanded legislation, with more cities and towns added to the PACT Act and additional military bases included, allowing more veterans to qualify for VA disability benefits.
Knight provided additional details about recent activities, praising the veterans services officer for doing an outstanding job filling the position after Dave’s retirement. He reported that the Wreaths Across America event raised enough money for over 800 wreaths, with Emily Dejoy and Kim Crowley organizing the successful fundraiser featuring the Nick and Brendan Band, which has a strong following and has played at the post multiple times.
Knight outlined upcoming events including November 8th hosting an event for the New England Center for Homeless Veterans, brought to them by Sue McGinnison and Josh Hopkins, featuring the J App Band. November 15th would feature Ricky Broden and Brian Ware for the Marblehead Food Pantry. The major event on December 13th would be Army Navy with a nine-person planning committee, jokingly noting that Grader might arrive at 7:30 AM. Knight expressed gratitude for the town’s support, particularly for the previous Saturday’s event, and noted ongoing improvements to the facility.
Knight announced that the committee had already held its first meeting for next year’s challenge coins, promising to provide coins to the select board, town manager, and secretary while keeping the design secret. He noted that people wanted the previous year’s coin again but confirmed they would not be reproducing it.
The veterans services officer discussed the POW chair initiative, explaining she had started similar projects in 2014 when she worked with former Representative DeLeo in Winthrop through Rolling Thunder. She reported reaching out to her VSO association and fellow VSOs, receiving over 100 responses indicating that approximately 136 towns have POW/MIA chairs. Some locations have multiple chairs, such as Winthrop which has them at both the football field and town hall. Only two towns reported not having them at town hall because they were located at local VFW posts instead.
The officer explained that the chair represents POWs and MIAs, and the VFW post had agreed to help sponsor the costs. She emphasized wanting something that would fit the decor of Abbott Hall rather than Mary Alley, believing it belonged where everyone could see it. Knight offered that the post would like to contribute but not carry the full cost.
Cost estimates were provided at $600-700 for the chair, flags, and stanchions, excluding the plaque for which prices were still being obtained. The officer noted that Hussey’s folding chair option wouldn’t fit the building’s decor, being more appropriate for stadiums. When asked about placement, she indicated they were still determining the location within Abbott Hall, having taken pictures of potential spots including the hallway, emphasizing the goal of showing reverence with a planned dedication involving the VFW.
Fox supported the initiative and indicated it would be placed on a future agenda for formal consideration, following the board’s protocol. Keezer confirmed that the final chair selection would be made collaboratively with a proposal brought to the board for approval. The officer confirmed they were looking for a non-folding chair appropriate for the purpose and had been examining different buildings for ideas. Fox thanked both speakers for their hard work and service.
Verizon Utility Pole Relocation Public Hearing (Link: 01:52:00 – 02:01:00)
Fox opened the public hearing for a Verizon petition for co-location on Rockaway Avenue, welcoming Gabrielle Luso. Fox read the formal notice stating that Verizon New England Inc. and Marblehead Municipal Light Department were seeking permission to locate poles, wires, cables and fixtures along Rockaway Avenue, specifically to relocate one joint pole 18 approximately 15 feet northwesterly from its existing location to accommodate the Marblehead Rail Trail.
Alexander Leslie Merrill, a resident of 17 Cross Street, Marlborough, identified himself as an employee of Pike Vik Telecom and Renewals LLC and authorized contractor for Verizon New England Incorporated. Merrill explained that Verizon was petitioning to relocate one existing joint pole located on the southern side of Rockaway Avenue approximately 15 feet in a northwesterly direction. He noted that both the existing pole and new pole would be 40 Class 2, with the relocation requested because the existing pole was in the way of the Marblehead Rail Trail.
Fox asked if anyone present wished to speak in opposition to the petition. Paul, a resident of 94 Rockaway Avenue, came forward expressing concern about how the project would impact his property and daily life. His neighbor Tara Kalanowski from unit two was also present. Paul asked about the construction process, timeline, and potential impacts.
Merrill explained that pole installation typically takes two to three days, with transferring cabling taking about a month depending on individual utilities. He noted that each utility – Marblehead Electric, a cable company, and Verizon – would take approximately one week to transfer cables from the old pole to the new pole. Merrill clarified that the pole would actually be moving away from Paul’s property toward the property line of 83 Rockaway Avenue, remaining the same size and class but located 50 feet from its current position.
When asked about service disruptions, Merrill stated there should be no interruption in electricity or cable services. He explained that after examining the pole, the relocation would move in the direction of the cabling, allowing them to simply coil excess cable rather than cutting it during the transfer, thus avoiding utility interruptions in the area.
Ken Planet from Community Development spoke in favor of the petition, explaining that the pole was located directly in the middle of the newly constructed rail trail path. Due to the immediacy of getting the project completed and out to bid, they were unable to coordinate with Verizon in advance. Planet noted that Marblehead Light had already worked with them to move a guy wire that posed a safety hazard, but they couldn’t move the pole because it belonged to Verizon. He expressed appreciation that this petition would remove the pole from the path and eliminate the rail trail conflict.
After closing the public hearing, Singer asked for clarification about responsibility for removing the old pole, expressing frustration about seeing old poles remain standing next to new ones around town. Merrill confirmed that Verizon would bear the responsibility and cost for removing the old pole.
Fox asked about the timeline for removing the old pole after installing the new one. Merrill estimated it should take about three weeks realistically, but noted it would depend on each individual utility’s scheduling. He clarified that if work were continuous, it would take about three weeks total, with approximately one week required for each utility to complete their transfers.
Fox made a motion to approve the Verizon New England Inc. plan, subject to Verizon hiring police details as required by the chief of police. The motion specified that the pole shall be of sound timber, reasonably straight, and set substantially in accordance with the filed plan dated September 9, 2025. The approval included permission to lay and maintain underground laterals, cables and wires for connection purposes, with space preserved for municipal fire and police signaling wires for public safety purposes only. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Johnny Ray’s Music Emporium Secondhand Dealer License (Link: 02:01:00 – 02:04:00)
Fox introduced the licensing application for a secondhand dealer license at Johnny Ray’s Music Emporium, welcoming Johnny Ray and his co-owner Richard. Fox asked them to present their application and tell the board about their business.
Johnny Ray explained that part of their inventory consists of secondhand items because they accept instruments on consignment. He described their existing system where they photograph each individual instrument, record serial numbers, and hold items for approximately 30 days. Richard added that they also take pictures of the person providing the consignment items as part of their licensing procedures.
Johnny Ray clarified that most of their merchandise consists of items they have previously owned themselves, primarily from a collection that Richard has accumulated over approximately 30 years as a musician. Fox noted that the application seemed straightforward and asked if there were any questions from the board.
Singer commented positively about seeing a retail business moving into the location, noting it had been vacant except for their temporary office use. She expressed appreciation for bringing something that would revitalize that corner and help the downtown area. Johnny Ray responded that they felt very fortunate when they walked into the space, finding it perfect for their intended use.
Fox mentioned that he had walked by and looked at the business, noting it looked great despite not being very musical himself. He jokingly mentioned being scared to come in and cautioned about asking for lessons. Fox thanked them for waiting through the long meeting and asked if there were any job openings or volunteer opportunities.
Fox made a motion to approve the application for Johnny Ray’s Music Emporium at 3135 Atlantic Avenue for a secondhand dealer license, subject to receipt of required documents, fees, and statutory approval. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously. The applicants thanked the board, and Fox encouraged them to visit the business.
Shinda Dynasty License Revocation Hearing Continuation (Link: 02:04:00 – 02:06:00)
Fox announced the continuation of a public hearing that was opened on November 13, 2024, regarding the revocation of wine and malt beverage license number 0042-RS0656 for Shinda Dynasty at 1 Atlantic Avenue. Fox explained that the owner, Alexander Lewis, was unable to appear before the board but had provided a written update included in the board’s packets.
Fox summarized Lewis’s written update, stating that significant progress had been made in recent weeks and that Lewis anticipated meeting the board’s deadline at the end of November. Fox noted that annual license renewals would be mailed out in the coming week, and Lewis would need to be in compliance, including passing inspection and obtaining proper seals, in order for his license to be renewed.
Fox made a motion to continue the public hearing to November 19, 2025, which was the date of their next meeting. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously. Fox then moved on to the next agenda item regarding an overhanging sign application.
Overhanging Sign Approval for 155 Washington Street (Link: 02:06:00 – 02:07:00)
A speaker clarified that the proposed sign would be made of wrought iron. Fox asked if there was currently any sign at the location, and the applicant confirmed there was nothing there currently, so this would not be replacing an existing sign.
A committee member asked whether the lettering would be embossed or painted on the surface. The applicant responded that it would be painted on the surface. Fox noted that the board had the application materials in front of them, including a picture showing the sign would be two by two feet for 155 Washington Street.
Fox asked if there were any other questions or comments, then apologized for making the applicant wait through the long meeting. Fox made a motion to approve the request from Judy Golditch to erect an overhanging sign at 155 Washington Street, subject to approval from the Old and Historic District Commission and receipt of the required certificate of insurance naming the town as additionally insured. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously. The applicant thanked the board, and Fox moved on to the next agenda item.
Army Corps of Engineers Memorandum of Agreement (Link: 02:07:00 – 02:08:00)
Brendan explained that the town was seeking a Chapter 91 permit for the boatyard project. He noted that there were a couple of structures in the Parker Boatyard area where the historical commission had flagged potential historical buildings based on a letter the Army Corps of Engineers received.
Brendan reported that the Army Corps of Engineers determined the town needed to survey those buildings and place them in the registry. After demolishing the buildings, the town would be required to install interpretive signage. He described this as an odd condition that represented the final piece needed to obtain the Chapter 91 permit, after which the town could move forward with the project.
Fox asked if Brendan had worked with the historic commission on this matter, and Brendan confirmed he had worked with them to some extent. Keezer added that the folks who needed to sign off on the agreement had been coordinated with.
Fox made a motion to approve the memorandum of agreement between the town, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Massachusetts State Historic Preservation Office as presented for the Marblehead shipyard resiliency application. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Officer Gallo Arbitration Settlement Update (Link: 02:08:00 – 02:16:00)
Fox provided an update on the Officer Gallo arbitration settlement, explaining that the town of Marblehead and Officer Christopher Gallo had reached a settlement agreement resolving all outstanding financial issues from an arbitration decision that reinstated Gallo following his termination in February 2024. Under the arbitration award, Gallo was entitled to back pay and related benefits for the period between his paid administrative leave in June 2021 and his reinstatement in 2025.
Fox detailed that the settlement finalized the exact amount owed, including salary, overtime, and details Gallo would have earned had he not been suspended or terminated, as well as reimbursement for health insurance premiums he paid under COBRA. The total settlement amount was $295,000, consisting of $260,000 in wages subject to deductions and withholdings, and $35,000 in non-wage reimbursement for COBRA health insurance costs.
The settlement would be paid in two installments over two fiscal years to manage budgetary impact. Approximately $150,000, including COBRA reimbursement, would be paid within 30 days of execution, and the remaining $145,000 by July 31, 2026. Additionally, the town would pay the remaining balance through the arbitrator directly.
Fox explained that this agreement represented a full and final resolution of all financial matters associated with the arbitration award without admission of wrongdoing by either party. He noted that arbitration proceedings always involve compromise and significant risk for both parties, with arbitrators often employing final offer approaches that are usually unfavorable to one side or the other. The settlement was viewed as a fair representation that avoided further legal fees or liability.
Fox stated that both the town and Officer Gallo retained their respective rights and responsibilities under Massachusetts law, and the agreement resolved only the financial components of the arbitration order. No questions were raised about the settlement.
Fox then moved to discuss the town charter questionnaire, noting that the select board was delinquent in returning the questionnaire distributed by the charter committee to all departments, boards, and committees. He identified a factual concern in Article 4, Section 4.1, paragraph 11, which referenced town meeting being authorized to direct select board actions. Fox noted that legal opinions from the state indicated town meeting cannot direct select board actions, referencing warrant articles from the previous year that had to be changed from “directs” to “advises.”
A committee member noted that the current charter outline worked well. Fox mentioned additional concerns compiled by Keezer, including questions about Article 4, Section 4.2, paragraph 3, regarding the town administrator’s prohibition from engaging in other business, specifically whether this would prohibit federal commitments such as National Guard or reserves service.
Fox suggested adding procurement responsibilities to the town administrator’s duties and expressed general concerns about ensuring the charter didn’t remove power from the select board to make changes without requiring state home rule petitions. He cited the capital planning committee as an example where the town administrator serves but the board might want flexibility to change that arrangement.
Singer noted that the board had recently reorganized committees and would be doing so again that evening, suggesting the charter should be less specific about committee makeup and defer to bylaws and select board organization. She emphasized not wanting to set in stone that the town administrator chairs certain committees, as this would remove flexibility as committees evolve and new positions like sustainability coordinator are created.
A committee member agreed that maintaining the select board’s ability to delegate specific responsibilities to the town administrator was important for consistency and flexibility.
Town Charter Committee Questionnaire Discussion (Link: 02:16:00 – 02:29:00)
Fox identified another concern in Article 4, Section 4.2, paragraph 9, which references exceptions related to school system functions. He noted that Keezer had served as negotiator for the school committee as chief bargaining agent and wanted to ensure the language was broad enough to accommodate this role.
Keezer explained that Chapter 150E, the collective bargaining law, makes the town administrator a voting member of the school committee for collective bargaining purposes. He noted that another reference restricting the town administrator from being a negotiating agent for schools could prohibit the school committee from appointing the town administrator as their bargaining agent, which was exactly the role he played the previous fall with two other committee members.
Fox indicated he had compiled the concerns and apologized to the charter committee for the select board’s delay in responding. Singer suggested adding language about awarding and executing contracts for the town under Article 4, Section 4.1, paragraph 5, which currently lists the select board’s direct responsibilities for public safety, human resources, budget and finance, long-term planning, public works and engineering, and properties and buildings.
Singer also proposed clarifying that the select board retains sole legal decision-making authority for the town regarding litigation matters and legal strategy, noting this wasn’t explicitly stated despite the many elected boards in town. She emphasized the importance of clarifying that one elected board cannot hire their own counsel independently.
A committee member noted the complexity of statutory environments and specific legal powers that boards may have based on state law. Singer acknowledged that while the select board covers insurance and makes settlement decisions, it would be helpful to capture their role as the primary executive board.
Fox questioned whether these powers already existed in state statutes or bylaws. Keezer noted that the presumptive description of power to engage with general government covers almost everything else. Singer suggested adding language recognizing the select board as head of town government for ceremonial purposes, memorializing current practice.
Singer proposed adding clauses about interim and acting town administrators, noting that other charters specify procedures when there’s a vacancy (select board appoints interim) versus extended absence (town administrator appoints department head to act). Fox questioned what the board currently relies on for such decisions.
A committee member asked whether they wanted to introduce something not currently practiced formally or have the charter represent current practice. Singer clarified they do appoint interim administrators when there are vacancies, referencing John McGinn’s appointment. Keezer noted he hadn’t formally designated acting administrators since he remains electronically connected when unavailable.
Singer referenced examples from other recent charters, including Maynard’s 2023 update, noting provisions for removal and contract renewal of town administrators. She questioned whether such provisions were better served in charters versus contracts, asking about the benefits of charter inclusion.
The discussion covered various technical details including town administrator duties to attend annual town meetings (which Keezer noted was in his contract), procurement responsibilities, and volunteer board terms. Singer suggested leaving appointing authority broadly with the select board rather than specifying particular committees.
Fox requested that Singer email her suggestions to him and Keezer for incorporation into the response. He clarified these were suggestions for clarification rather than criticisms of current practices. Fox made a motion to authorize the chair to respond to the charter committee questionnaire as discussed, which was seconded and approved.
Cannabis Social Equity Policy Adoption (Link: 02:29:00 – 02:35:00)
Fox introduced the cannabis social equity policy agenda item, with Keezer taking the lead on the presentation. Keezer explained that this policy was a requirement under the Cannabis Control Commission and had been presented several meetings prior. He noted that Marblehead has two host community agreements that it’s authorizing, and the policy would establish a process requiring one of those agreements to meet social equity criteria at renewal time, specifically minority-owned or disadvantaged business criteria previously discussed.
Keezer emphasized this was a mandatory requirement and would impact their host community agreements as they come up for renewal within the next year, with one expiring in April and another in November. He presented what he called the final draft with no changes from the previous presentation, noting they had received no further input.
The one discretionary matter highlighted on the second page was fee reduction. Keezer explained they were allowed to implement up to a 3% impact fee on these organizations for costs they impose, and the policy guidelines suggested discounting that impact fee by some amount. He recommended a 1% discount, clarifying that they could charge zero, one, or two percent, as anything higher wouldn’t constitute a discount.
Fox asked if Keezer had researched how other municipalities were handling this issue. Keezer responded that most were likely doing the same thing. He noted that the total impact fees collected in Marblehead was zero because neither establishment was open yet. Drawing from his experience in Framingham, a city of almost 80,000 with over 20 applicants authorized for six locations, he found it difficult to get departments to identify anything warranting impact fees despite initial concerns about municipal impacts.
Keezer explained that in Framingham, they had imposed upfront impact fee deposits but ultimately returned the money to businesses because it created a liability on their books affecting free cash. He characterized the impact fee as likely a non-issue, suggesting the 1% discount was reasonable but expressing surprise if they ever reached that threshold.
Fox asked about the types of impacts that would warrant fees. Keezer mentioned examples like traffic lights, road improvements, and police details due to long lines, noting that the feared impacts from the cannabis industry had hardly materialized. He added that the Cannabis Control Commission and legislature define what can be imposed as impact fees.
Fox asked if the board was ready to vote, and Keezer confirmed they needed to vote as they were past the deadline. He noted that the penalty for missing the deadline would be the state taking back any collected impact fees, though the amount was zero. Singer asked for clarification about the two establishments, and Keezer confirmed that one would need to be reserved for social equity when it expires and comes up for renewal.
Keezer indicated that based on information provided by the new owners who took over Seven Leaves, they might meet the social equity criteria, though this would need to be vetted. Fox made a motion for the select board to adopt the proposed cannabis social equity policy as presented. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Police Department Hold Harmless Agreement (Link: 02:35:00 – 02:36:00)
Keezer explained that the town has several hold harmless agreements in place with other municipalities including Salem, Swampscott, and others. He noted that the police chief was supposed to be present to explain the agreement but was stuck at an airport. Keezer clarified that these agreements are reciprocal arrangements where in order for Marblehead to allow police officers from Nahant to operate in Marblehead, Nahant must allow Marblehead officers to operate there.
Fox confirmed this was a standard form that had been used before and made a motion to approve the hold harmless agreement as presented between the town and the Nahant Police Department, authorizing the chair to sign on behalf of the board. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox then introduced the next agenda item regarding the Green Marblehead committee reorganization, explaining it would replace the town planner position with the community development and planning director as the designated member representing the community development department. He noted this was straightforward and made sense since they didn’t have a community development planning director at the time the committee was originally established.
Green Marblehead Committee Reorganization (Link: 02:37:00 – 02:38:00)
Fox confirmed that the reorganization was straightforward, essentially swapping out positions on the Green Marblehead committee. Fox asked if there were any questions about replacing the town planner position with the community development and planning director position, noting it was simply swapping who serves on the committee.
Fox made a motion to approve the recommendation to replace the town planner as a member of the Green Marblehead committee with the community development and planning director. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox then moved to the consent agenda items, making a motion to approve the minutes of October 1, 2025 and October 9, 2025, as well as the Abbott Hall Festival of Arts Artisans Holiday Marketplace for December 5-7, 2025, subject to usual rules, regulations, fees, and receipt of required certificate of insurance. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox introduced the contract approvals, beginning with the Gatchell playground lighting project. He explained this was a change order in the amount of $13,540.12 to be paid from the recreation revolving fund. Fox made a motion to approve the change order to contract 2025010 for the Gatchell playground lighting project between the town and Ham Electric LLC in the amount of $13,540.12, authorizing the chair to sign on behalf of the board.
Contract Approvals and Consent Agenda (Link: 02:38:00 – 02:55:00)
The Gatchell playground lighting project change order was seconded and approved unanimously. Fox then introduced the on-call HVAC maintenance repair contract, asking Keezer to explain the details.
Keezer explained that the town was trying to establish proper building maintenance instead of relying primarily on inspectors for maintenance work. The procurement was for on-call HVAC services with a dollar figure of $142,950, which he clarified was not an obligation or allocation but rather a unit price bid. Bidders provided hourly rates and material markup percentages, with the town creating a scenario of 700 hours of service time and $25,000 in supplies to enable fair comparison. The dollar figure was only for comparative bidding purposes, with actual spending dependent on need and budget allocation.
Fox asked if Town General Air Conditioning was the lowest bidder among multiple bidders. Keezer indicated he didn’t know in this specific case, but noted that if they weren’t the lowest bidder, it would mean a lower bidder was disqualified for not meeting qualification criteria. A committee member compared it to an advance appropriation in anticipation of need. Fox made a motion to award contract 26-S12 for on-call HVAC maintenance and repair to General Air Conditioning Heating Inc. for $142,950 for one year with two optional renewal years, which was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox introduced the COA fencing project for $18,500, funded from the building improvement account. After confirming no questions about the project, Fox made a motion to award contract 26-14 for the COA fencing project to New Generation Landscaping and Fencing for $18,500, which was seconded and approved unanimously.
The rail trail project item was identified as a time extension rather than a dollar amount, allowing for plantings and other work. Fox made a motion to extend contract 2024-071 for the Marblehead Rail Trail Swampscott Branch project with Raphael Construction Corporation until December 30, 2025, which was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox introduced the Reynolds Field project, noting it was being managed by Recreation and Parks with commissioners available for questions. The funding would come from the Lars Anderson gift account, with the town having chosen CHA Harbor & Associates LLP through procurement.
A Recreation and Parks commissioner explained they had interviewed two companies and unanimously chose CHA & Associates because they had a dedicated division for sports municipalities and gymnasiums with all personnel in-house, providing better long-term value. The other firm was assembling a team, which they felt created significant potential for change orders. The current requisition for $69,100 would cover the first three tasks: collaboration between town departments, topography studies and surveys, and wetland delineations to determine what could actually be built given drainage issues and ledge conditions.
The commissioner explained they would receive an a la carte menu of costs, then define phase one and return to the select board for additional Lars Anderson fund expenditure. Fox clarified they were approving the full contract amount while the commission would submit requisitions incrementally. Fox made a motion to award contract 2025-009 for the Reynolds Playground Design project to CHA Harbor & Associates LLP for $581,290, which was seconded and approved unanimously.
Keezer explained the Collins Center contract situation, noting they had worked out an agreement for the center to complete outstanding deliverables under the original contract without additional expense. The original $20,000 contract included provisions for hourly engagement if needed, but the current work would be completed under existing obligations.
A committee member expressed concerns about the Collins Center’s performance, noting that two principals had left or were on medical leave, questioning who would review the work. Keezer confirmed they had identified someone experienced with charters to handle the review. Singer emphasized that any additional work would need charter committee approval and would stay within scope.
Fox concluded the contract approvals and moved to one-day liquor licenses, making a motion to approve applications for Old North Church (Link: November 14, 6:30-9:30 PM), Friends of Performing Arts at King Hooper Mansion (Link: November 6, 6:00-10:30 PM), and Donald Carlton Marblehead Arts Association (Link: November 8, 6:00-8:30 PM). The approvals were subject to standard conditions including $50 fees, proof of authorized alcohol purchase from Cappy’s Importing and Distributing Company and Oz Wine Company, and compliance with General Law Chapter 138. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
One Day Liquor Licenses and Rail Trail Signage (Link: 02:55:00 – 03:01:00)
The one-day liquor license motion was approved with individual roll call votes from Singer, Grader, and Fox all in favor. Fox then introduced Brendan Callahan for the rail trail signage discussion, explaining this was for the rail trail completion near the Rockway Clifton Avenue segment construction phase with an 11-foot wide pathway.
Callahan explained that as part of the rail trail project, they were installing signage that had been presented in draft form in July with input from town staff and Chief King. The revised sign would be installed at the Smith Street and Rockaway segments that were recently completed, not throughout the entire rail trail at this time, specifically at the Rockaway Clifton segment and the Smith Pleasant Street segment.
A committee member asked whether electric-powered bicycles were considered motorized vehicles. Callahan indicated Chief King would be better positioned to answer, but noted there were different tiers based on maximum speed capabilities. Keezer confirmed that classification depends on speed, with certain speed capabilities moving e-bikes into different categories that would be considered motorized.
Singer asked about the sign size, and Callahan estimated it was approximately eight and a half by thirteen inches. Singer initially thought the color was red but Callahan clarified it was brown, similar to colors used in state and national parks. Singer expressed preference for green or brown coloring, and Callahan noted the only red element would be for emergency information.
Fox made a motion to approve the request from Brendan Callahan, Director of Community Development and Planning Department, to install the proposed rail trail sign for the Marblehead Rail Trail at the Rockway Clifton Avenue rail trail segment. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox introduced another signage request from the Old Marblehead Improvement Association, noting they had completed repair work on stones and brick walkway replacement at the Old Townhouse on their own initiative and were requesting a sign to acknowledge their contribution. A committee member commented that the work looked outstanding.
Fox made a motion to approve the request from Marion Griswold of the Old Marblehead Improvement Association to install a sign measuring 15 inches by 7 inches under the crabapple tree by the main entrance to the Old Townhouse in recognition of OMIA’s contribution. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously.
Fox announced a notice from the shellfish department regarding classification changes under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 130, Section 48. The status change opened shell fishing from October 1, 2025 through April 30, 2026 for the flats at Devereaux and Tucker’s Beach, characterizing this as an informational announcement.
Fox noted they had received three letters of interest for Shellfish Constable positions, with two vacancies available. He recommended setting a deadline of November 7th for applications with interviews on November 19th. For the Disability Commission, which had three vacancies with different filling guidelines, Fox suggested a deadline of December 5th with interviews on December 12th.
Singer provided housekeeping information, confirming they were scheduled for November 19th as their only regular meeting unless something urgent arose. Fox anticipated potential contracts or other business requiring attention. After some confusion about dates, Fox clarified that disability commission interviews would be held December 10th at their regular meeting, not on a Friday night.
Fox made a motion to adjourn, which was seconded and approved unanimously, concluding the meeting.
All About Town provides all information in a good faith effort to improve community engagement and awareness. However, text is generated by artificial intelligence, and we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information provided herein. Use of the site and reliance on any information on the site is solely at each individual’s own risk.